The Impact of Using A Linear Model for the Ordinal Response of Mixture Experiments
Abstract
In a sensory test, the response is a Likert scale, which belongs to the ordinal scale. The ordinal response can be analyzed using a linear model approach; however, this approach can be misleading. This research aims to compare three different methods for ordinal response: the average score, the second-order Scheffe model, and the ordinal logistic model. The case study focused on the response to the taste of cookies resulting from the mixture experiment. The mixture experiment is one type of experimental design which is commonly used for product formulation. The research involved three ingredients with different lower bonds. The D-optimal design which also the {3,2} simplex-lattice design was chosen for the experiment. The three methods were conducted, and they all yielded the same results for the optimum composition; however, the ordinal model provided more information about the data's characteristics. The optimal formulation of each ingredient was 10%, 20%, 70%.
Keywords
References
H. Wu and S. O. Leung, “Can Likert Scales be Treated as Interval Scales?—A Simulation Study,” J Soc Serv Res, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 527–532, 2017, doi: 10.1080/01488376.2017.1329775.
A. Agresti, C. Franklin, and B. Klingnberg, The art and science of learning from data. 2018. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
S. V. Archontoulis and F. E. Miguez, “Nonlinear regression models and applications in agricultural research,” Agron J, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 786–798, 2015, doi: 10.2134/agronj2012.0506.
C. Y. J. Peng, K. L. Lee, and G. M. Ingersoll, “An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2002, doi: 10.1080/00220670209598786.
P. McCullagh, “Regression Models for Ordinal Data Author ( s ): Peter McCullagh Source : Journal of the Royal Statistical Society . Series B ( Methodological ), Vol . 42 , No . 2 Published by : Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Statistical Society Stable URL : http://w,” Society, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 109–142, 2009.
R. Bender and U. Grouven, “Using binary logistic regression models for ordinal data with non-proportional odds,” J Clin Epidemiol, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 809–816, 1998, doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00066-3.
M. Mancenido, R. Pan, and D. Montgomery, “Analysis of subjective ordinal responses in mixture experiments,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 196–208, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00224065.2016.11918159.
P. Goos, “The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-plot Experiments,” Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2001.
A. C. Atkinson et al., “Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS,” Technometrics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 381–397, 1989.
R. H. Hardin and N. J. A. Sloane, “A new approach to the construction of optimal designs,” J Stat Plan Inference, vol. 37, pp. 339–369, 1993.
B. Jones and P. Goos, “I-optimal versus {D}-optimal split-plot response-surface designs,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 44, pp. 85–101, 2012.
L. Tack, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek, “Efficient D-optimal Designs Under Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity,” 1999.
R. D. Hilgers, “D-optimal Design for Becker’s Minimum Polynomial,” Stat Probab Lett, vol. 49, pp. 783–789, 2000.
V. Czitrom, “Mixture Experiments with Process Variables: D-optimal Orthogonal Experimental Plans,” Commun Stat Theory Methods, vol. 17, pp. 105–121, 1988.
L. Y. Chan, J. H. Meng, Y. C. Jiang, and Y. N. Guan, “D-optimal axial designs for quadratic and cubic additive mixture models,” Aust N Z J Stat, vol. 40, pp. 359–371, 1998.
C. M. Anderson-Cook, C. M. Borror, and D. C. Montgomery, “Response surface design evaluation and comparison,” J Stat Plan Inference, vol. 139, pp. 629–674, 2009.
P. Goos, B. Jones, and U. Syafitri, “I-Optimal Design of Mixture Experiments,” J Am Stat Assoc, vol. 111, no. 514, 2016, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1136632.
P. Goos and B. Jones, Design of Experiments: A Case Study Approach. Wiley, 2011.
S. S. Ranade and P. Thiagarajan, “D VERSUS I OPTIMAL DESIGN: WHAT TO CHOOSE?,” 2016. [Online]. Available: www.ijptonline.com
M. V Mancenido, “Categorical Responsesn in Mixture Experiments,” 2016.
D. R. Marble, J. E. Hunter, H. C. Knandel, and R. A. Dutcher, “Fishy Flavor and Odor in Turkey Meat*,” 1937.
J. Neter, M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman, Applied Linear Statistical Models. London: Irwin, 1996.
L. Khikmah, H. Wijayanto, and U. D. Syafitri, “Modeling Governance KB with CATPCA to Overcome Multicollinearity in the Logistic Regression,” J Phys Conf Ser, vol. 824, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012027.
N. A. M. R. Senaviratna and T. M. J. A. Cooray, “Diagnosing Multicollinearity of Logistic Regression Model,” Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, pp. 1–9, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i230132.
S. Steiner, M. Mancenido, R. Pan, and D. Montgomery, “Analysis of subjective ordinal responses in mixture experiments,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 196–208, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00224065.2016.11918159.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/zero.v9i2.25760
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Publisher : Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science and Technology Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan | |
✉️ Email: zero_journal@uinsu.ac.id 📱 WhatsApp:085270009767 (Admin Official) | |
 |  |  |  |  |