- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Archiving
- Plagiarism Check
- Publication Ethics
- AI Tools Usage Policy
- Corrections, Retractions & Withdrawal
Focus and Scope
Aims and Scope
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to mathematics and its applications, published by the Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (UIN Sumatera Utara), Medan, Indonesia.
| e-ISSN / p-ISSN | 2580-5754 / 2580-569X |
| Publisher | Dept. of Mathematics, FST, UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan |
| Frequency | Three issues per year |
| Language | English or Indonesian |
| Peer Review | Double-blind |
| Access | Open access |
Aims
The journal aims to advance knowledge in mathematics and its applications by disseminating rigorous, original, and reproducible research to an international readership of academics, researchers, educators, and practitioners. It bridges theoretical development and real-world application in science, industry, finance, technology, and education, while upholding high standards of academic integrity and methodological soundness.
Scope
The journal publishes original research articles, systematic review papers, and methodologically substantive case studies contributing to pure and applied mathematics and to mathematics education. Topics include, but are not limited to:
| · Mathematical modeling, simulation & dynamical systems |
| · Operations research, optimization & mathematical programming |
| · Applied statistics, stochastic modeling & data science |
| · Machine learning & computational intelligence |
| · Actuarial & financial mathematics |
| · Graph theory, discrete mathematics & combinatorics |
| · Real analysis, geometry & algebra with applications |
| · Fuzzy systems and their applications |
| · Computational & numerical mathematics |
| · Mathematics education, assessment & learning design |
Manuscripts falling outside these areas, or lacking demonstrable novelty and rigor, are outside the scope of the journal.
Article Types
| Original Research | New theoretical or applied results. |
| Review Article | Critical, structured synthesis of an established topic. |
| Case Study | Rigorous methods applied to a well-defined real-world problem. |
Section Policies
Articles
Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan are evaluated through a rigorous double-blind peer-review process, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are mutually concealed. Each manuscript is assessed by at least two independent expert reviewers. Submissions must comply with the journal's Focus and Scope and Author Guidelines, and must be original, free of plagiarism, and demonstrate clear scientific merit and novelty.
Stages of Review
| 1. Initial Screening | The editorial team checks each submission for scope, structure, language, and completeness, and screens for similarity using Turnitin (maximum similarity of 20%). Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be returned or rejected without external review. |
| 2. Double-Blind Review | Qualified manuscripts are sent to at least two reviewers, who assess novelty, methodological soundness, validity of results, clarity, and adequacy of references. Where reviews conflict, the editor may appoint an additional reviewer. |
| 3. Revision | Authors receive the reviewers' comments and are required to revise the manuscript accordingly and provide a point-by-point response. Revised manuscripts may undergo further rounds of review. |
| 4. Editorial Decision | Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor issues one of four decisions: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject. The final decision rests with the Editor-in-Chief. |
Indicative Timeline
| Initial screening | 1–2 weeks |
| Peer review | 2–8 weeks |
| Editorial decision after revision | 2–4 weeks |
Reviewers act independently and objectively; their comments are confidential and intended solely to improve the scientific quality of the manuscript. Accepted articles are published in order of final acceptance date. The journal reserves the right to reject any manuscript that does not meet its scholarly or ethical standards at any stage of the process.
Publication Frequency
Publication Frequency
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan publishes three issues per year. Articles are issued in continuous fashion and assigned to the current issue upon completion of the editorial process.
| 2017 – 2024 | Biannual (June and December). |
| From 2025 | Triannual (three issues per year), in accordance with the journal's latest registration with BRIN. |
This schedule enables timely dissemination of research while maintaining the journal's rigorous peer-review standards.
Open Access Policy
Open Access Policy
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is a fully open-access journal. All articles are made freely and permanently available immediately upon publication, with no subscription, registration, or payment required from readers. This policy is founded on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
| Access | Immediate and unrestricted; no embargo period. |
| Reader cost | Free to read, download, copy, distribute, and print. |
| License | Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0). |
| Self-archiving | Authors may deposit all versions in institutional or subject repositories and on personal websites. |
This journal aligns with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition of open access: users are free to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, provided the authors and the journal are properly credited.
Archiving
Digital Archiving and Preservation
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is committed to the long-term preservation of its scholarly content, ensuring continued access even if the journal ceases publication.
| Preservation network | The journal participates in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), which provides distributed, long-term digital preservation for content published on Open Journal Systems. |
| LOCKSS & CLOCKSS | The journal supports the LOCKSS and CLOCKSS systems, creating distributed archives among participating libraries that permit them to preserve and restore content. |
| Persistent identifiers | Each article is assigned a DOI registered with Crossref, ensuring a stable, permanent link to the published version. |
| Institutional repository | Published articles are also indexed and archived through the journal's indexing partners and the institutional repository of UIN Sumatera Utara. |
These measures safeguard the integrity and accessibility of the scholarly record over time.
Plagiarism Check
Plagiarism Screening Policy
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is committed to upholding international standards of academic integrity. Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable. Every submitted manuscript is screened for originality, and confirmed plagiarism results in the actions described below.
Screening Tool and Threshold
All manuscripts are checked with Turnitin originality-checking software. A maximum similarity index of 20% (excluding the reference list) is permitted. Manuscripts exceeding this threshold are returned to the authors for revision or rejected, at the editor's discretion. Screening is performed twice: upon submission (initial screening) and prior to publication.
What Constitutes Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the use of another's ideas, information, words, data, or figures without proper attribution—whether intentional or unintentional. It includes, but is not limited to:
| Verbatim copying | Reproducing text word-for-word without quotation marks and citation. |
| Paraphrasing plagiarism | Rewording another's work without acknowledging the source. |
| Mosaic plagiarism | Combining phrases from several sources without proper credit. |
| Data and idea appropriation | Using another's methodology, interpretation, data, or figures without citation, even when developed further. |
| Self-plagiarism | Reusing substantial portions of one's own previously published work without disclosure and citation. |
Citation Requirements
Whenever an author draws specific information (a name, date, place, statistic, or other detail) or an idea—such as an interpretation, a choice of methodology, or a conclusion—from a particular source, a citation is required, even if the author subsequently develops the idea further. Attribution is not required only for genuine common knowledge. Where an author extends an existing idea, the original source must still be cited before the author's own contribution is presented.
Actions Upon Detection
| Before publication | Manuscripts found to contain plagiarism are rejected. Authors may be required to revise and resubmit for minor, clearly unintentional cases, at the editor's discretion. |
| After publication | Confirmed plagiarism leads to correction or retraction of the article in accordance with COPE guidelines, with a public notice. |
| Further consequences | The authors' institutions may be notified, and repeat or severe offenders may be barred from future submissions. |
Authors are encouraged to check their manuscripts with plagiarism-detection software before submission. Responsibility for the originality of a submission rests with the authors.
Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published three times a year by the Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (UIN Sumatera Utara), Medan, Indonesia. The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against publication malpractice. This statement is based on the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and defines the ethical conduct expected of all parties involved in publishing: authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.
Duties of Editors
| Publication decisions | Editors are responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts are published, based solely on the validity, scientific merit, and importance of the work, guided by peer-review reports and the journal's policies. |
| Fair play | Manuscripts are evaluated on intellectual content without regard to the authors' race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or institutional affiliation. |
| Confidentiality | Editors must not disclose information about a submission to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and the publisher, as appropriate. |
| Conflicts of interest | Unpublished material in a submission must not be used in an editor's own research without the author's written consent. Editors recuse themselves from handling manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest. |
| Integrity | Editors safeguard the integrity of the published record, issue corrections or retractions when necessary, and investigate allegations of misconduct in accordance with COPE guidelines. |
Duties of Reviewers
| Contribution | Peer review assists editors in making decisions and helps authors improve their manuscripts. |
| Promptness | A reviewer who feels unqualified or unable to review promptly should notify the editor and withdraw from the process. |
| Confidentiality | Manuscripts under review are confidential and must not be shown to or discussed with others, nor uploaded to public or unsecured AI tools. |
| Objectivity | Reviews must be objective and constructive; personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Views should be supported by clear arguments. |
| Acknowledgment of sources | Reviewers should identify relevant published work not cited by the authors and alert editors to any substantial similarity with other works. |
| Conflicts of interest | Privileged information obtained through review must remain confidential. Reviewers must decline manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest. |
Duties of Authors
| Reporting standards | Authors must present an accurate account of their work and an objective discussion of its significance, with sufficient detail and references to permit replication. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements are unacceptable. |
| Data access and retention | Authors may be asked to provide the raw data and code supporting their manuscript and should retain these for a reasonable period after publication. |
| Originality and plagiarism | Submissions must be entirely original; the work and words of others must be appropriately cited. All manuscripts are screened with Turnitin, and a maximum similarity of 20% applies. |
| Multiple or concurrent publication | Authors must not submit the same research to more than one journal concurrently or publish essentially the same work in more than one venue. |
| Authorship | Authorship is limited to those who made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. The corresponding author ensures all co-authors have approved the final version and its submission. |
| Conflicts of interest and funding | Authors must disclose any financial or substantive conflict of interest and all sources of funding for the research. |
| Fundamental errors | When an author discovers a significant error in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate to correct or retract the article. |
Duties of the Publisher
The Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sumatera Utara, as publisher, safeguards editorial independence and ensures that commercial or other interests do not influence editorial decisions. The publisher supports the editors in handling allegations of misconduct and, where necessary, in publishing corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies.
Handling of Misconduct
Allegations of research or publication misconduct—including plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, image manipulation, redundant publication, and authorship disputes—are investigated in accordance with COPE guidelines. Confirmed violations may result in rejection, correction, or retraction of the article and notification of the authors' institutions.
AI Tools Usage Policy
Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools
1. Purpose and Scope
This policy governs the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in work submitted to, reviewed for, and published by ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan. It applies to authors, reviewers, and editors across all article types. The policy exists to enable the responsible use of AI while safeguarding scientific integrity, reproducibility, confidentiality, and human accountability, and is aligned with the Core Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
2. Guiding Principles
| Human accountability | Responsibility for every element of a published work rests entirely with its human authors. AI cannot bear accountability and cannot assume any role that requires it. |
| Transparency | Any use of AI beyond routine language assistance must be disclosed clearly enough for readers to understand what was done and by which tool. |
| Verification | AI output is provisional. Authors must independently confirm every claim, computation, proof, citation, and figure derived with AI assistance. |
3. Definition of AI Tools
AI tools are software or systems that apply techniques such as machine learning, natural language processing, or deep learning to generate, transform, translate, summarize, or analyze text, numerical data, code, or visual material. This includes generative large language models (for example, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude), AI-based writing and translation aids, and AI systems used for data analysis, visualization, or the generation of figures and statistical output.
4. Permitted Uses
Under human oversight, authors may use AI tools to support:
| · Improving grammar, clarity, readability, and academic tone |
| · Reference formatting and preliminary literature searches |
| · Supporting—not replacing—statistical analysis, mathematical derivation, coding, or simulation, with all results validated by the author |
| · Producing conceptual or illustrative diagrams, subject to Section 6 |
Basic-language exemption: the use of AI solely for routine spelling, grammar, and punctuation correction does not require a formal declaration. Any use beyond this threshold must be disclosed under Section 8.
5. Prohibited Uses
AI tools must not be used to:
| · Generate whole manuscripts or substantive original content presented as the authors' own scholarly work |
| · Fabricate or falsify data, results, computations, proofs, references, or figures |
| · Produce translations or paraphrases published without human verification, or that constitute plagiarism |
| · Create content that infringes copyright or uses third-party material without authorization |
6. AI-Generated Figures, Images, and Data
AI must not be used to create or alter figures that constitute primary scientific evidence, such as experimental images, raw-data plots, or micrographs. AI-assisted generation of purely conceptual graphics (for example, flowcharts or schematic diagrams) is permitted only when the AI tool is explicitly named in the figure caption. Any non-generative enhancement of existing images must likewise be disclosed in the caption to allow case-by-case editorial review.
7. Authorship
AI tools are not eligible for authorship, co-authorship, or citation as an author under any circumstances. Authorship is reserved for individuals who make substantial intellectual contributions and can be held accountable for the work. Listing an AI tool as an author or contributor in any form may result in rejection or retraction.
8. Disclosure and Declaration
Where AI use exceeds the basic-language exemption, authors must include a dedicated statement at the end of the manuscript, immediately before the reference list, titled "Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies." The declaration must state:
| · The name, version, and developer of each AI tool |
| · The specific purpose and extent of its use |
9. AI Used Within the Research Methodology
This policy distinguishes AI used to assist writing from AI that forms part of the research method itself (for example, machine-learning models or algorithmic analysis central to the study). Where AI is part of the methodology, it must be described in the Methods section in sufficient detail to permit reproducibility, rather than only noted in the declaration.
10. Confidentiality of the Authors' Own Data
Authors are responsible for reviewing the terms and conditions of any AI tool they use, to ensure that the privacy and confidentiality of their inputs—including unpublished manuscripts, proprietary data, and personally identifiable information—are preserved. Citations produced or modified with AI assistance must be checked carefully, as such tools may generate inaccurate or non-existent references.
11. Responsibilities of Editors and Reviewers
To protect confidentiality and intellectual property, editors and reviewers must not upload a submitted manuscript, or any part of it—including text, data, tables, or figures—into public or unsecured generative AI tools. AI must not be used to generate a review report or to substitute for a reviewer's expert judgment. If an AI tool is used only to refine the language of a review, that use must be declared transparently to the editorial office.
12. Editorial Screening and Enforcement
Editors assess AI-related disclosures as part of their ethical and methodological evaluation. The journal does not rely solely on automated detection; all assessments involve human judgment and direct communication with authors. Where undisclosed or inappropriate AI use is suspected, the editorial team may request clarification or revision, reject the submission, or initiate a formal investigation and, if warranted, notify the author's institution.
13. Consequences of Non-Compliance
| · Immediate rejection of the submission |
| · Post-publication correction or retraction |
| · Formal notification to the author's affiliated institution |
| · Prohibition from future submissions in cases of severe or repeated violation |
14. Appeals
Authors may submit a written appeal against an AI-related editorial decision to the Editor-in-Chief, stating the grounds for dispute with supporting evidence and reference to the relevant sections of this policy. Appeals are reviewed by the journal's ethics committee and, where warranted, referred to an independent COPE adviser.
15. Policy Governance and Review
This policy is reviewed and updated periodically to reflect advances in AI technology and evolving best practice in scholarly publishing. Authors should consult the current version before submission and contact the editorial office with any questions regarding compliance.
16. Ethical Framework and References
This policy draws on the standards and guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), including the COPE Core Practices, the COPE position on authorship and AI tools, and its guidance on authorship, contributorship, and retractions. All authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to uphold these principles as a condition of participation in ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan.
Corrections, Retractions & Withdrawal
Corrections, Retractions, and Withdrawals
ZERO: Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Terapan is committed to maintaining the integrity of the published record. When errors or misconduct are identified after publication, the journal acts in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
| Correction (Erratum) | Issued for significant errors that affect the record but not the validity of the findings (e.g., author names, affiliations, data or figure errors). A correction notice is published and linked to the original article, which remains available. |
| Retraction | Issued for invalid or unreliable findings, plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, redundant publication, or unethical research. The article is retained but clearly marked "Retracted", with a public retraction notice stating the reason. |
| Expression of Concern | Issued when a matter is under investigation and readers should be alerted before a final decision is reached. |
| Withdrawal | Applies only to manuscripts in press (before formal publication), for example duplicate submissions or errors discovered pre-publication. Published articles are not withdrawn; they are corrected or retracted. |
Procedure
| · Concerns may be raised by authors, readers, reviewers, or editors, in writing to the editorial office. |
| · The editorial team investigates, consulting the authors and, where necessary, their institutions. |
| · A decision is made following COPE flowcharts, and any notice is linked to the original article. |
| · The DOI and metadata are updated so that indexing services reflect the change. |
Requests and concerns should be sent to zero_journal@uinsu.ac.id.