Zone of teacher promoted action based on gender in math lesson

Nadrah Afiati Nasution; Nurhasanah Siregar; Imelda Wardani Br. Rambe; Erminawaty Simanjuntak

doi:10.30821/axiom.v13i2.20104

Zone of teacher promoted action based on gender in math lesson

Nadrah Afiati Nasution, Nurhasanah Siregar, Imelda Wardani Br. Rambe, Erminawaty Simanjuntak

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the Zone of Promoted Action (ZPA) of teachers in the context of mathematics learning, based on gender. This research is a descriptive exploratory study using a qualitative approach. The data analysis techniques employed in this study include data transcription, data checking, data reduction, data credibility, and conclusion drawing. The subjects of this study are pre-service PPG students who are prospective teachers. The instruments used in this study include questionnaires and observation sheets. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that each teacher, regardless of gender background, possesses unique ZPA capabilities characterized by their ability to manage time, guide discussions, and focus students on the material.

Keywords

Gender; Learning mathematics; Zone of promoted action

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al Baqi, S. (2023). How teacher’s gender influence student’s gender identity in early childhood. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 17(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.171.08

American Psychological Association. (2013). 2012 Annual report of the American Psychological Association. In The American psychologist (Vol. 68, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094960

Blanton, M. L., Westbrook, S., & Carter, G. (2005). Using valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-0456-1

Budi, M., Ali, M. S., & Nasrullah. (2023). Pengaruh perbedaan jenis kelamin guru terhadap minat belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran pendidikan agama islam. Al-Furqan: Jurnal Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 2(4), 132–145. https://publisherqu.com/index.php/Al-Furqan/article/view/487

Danoebroto, S. wulandari. (2015). Teori belajar konstruktivis piaget dan vygotsky. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 2(3), 191–198. http://idealmathedu.p4tkmatematika.orgissn2407-7925

Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, Rahardi, R., Susiswo, Subanji, & Agustina, R. K. (2022). Teachers’ communication in mathematics learning based on zone of promote action. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2633(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102613

Goos, M. (2005). A sociocultural analysis of learning to teach. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Pscyhology of Mathematics Education, 3(June), 49–56.

Iffah, J. D. N., Sutawidjaja, A., Sadijah, C., & Subanji. (2016). Teacher ’ s Rejected Promote Action ( R -PA ) for Mathematics Teaching Practice in Class. IOSR: Journal of Research & Method in Education, 6(5), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0605031218

Iffah, J. D. N., & Tristanti, L. B. (2022). Describing prospective teacher’s promote action in online mathematics learning. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 7(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v7i3.17258

Isak, G., & Posch, P. (2013). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(2), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311323414

Jauhara, D. N. I., Akbar, S., Cholis, S., & Subanji. (2017). Using valsiners zone theory for identifying the forms of students pseudo responses in mathematics teaching process. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(15), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.3098

Lamb, C., W, Hair, J., F, M., Octarevia, C., & David. (2011). Pemasaran buku 1. Salemba Empat.

Pulungan, N. A. (2019). Kelamin Guru Dengan Prestasi Belajar Biologi Siswa Di Sma Negeri 2 Padangsidimpuan. Journal Education and Development, 7(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v7i1.782

Rachman, M., & Tjalla, A. (2008). Keterampilan pengelolaan kelas dilihat dari jenis kelamin dan kecerdasan emosi guru sekolah luar biasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Gunadarma, 2(1), 1–7. http://www.ejournal.gunadarma.ac.id/index.php/psiko/article/view/238%0Ahttp://www.ejournal.gunadarma.ac.id/index.php/psiko/article/viewFile/238/179

Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Arlinwibowo, J., Wulandari, N. F., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Teachers’difficulties in implementing thematic teaching and learning in elementary schools teachers ’ diffi culties in implementing thematic teaching. The New Educational Review, 48(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.48.2.16

Suardipa, I. P. (2020). Proses scaffolding pada zone of proximal development (zpd) dalam pembelajaran. Widyacarya, 4(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.55115/widyacarya.v4i1.555

Suhaibah, Syafruddin, R., & Washfiah, K. (2022). Pengaruh perbedaan jenis kelamin guru terhadap minat belajar siswa. The 4th Annual Postgraduate Conference on Muslim Society, 27–34.

Sum, T. A., & Talu, A. T. I. (2019). Faktor penyebab kurangnya minat laki-laki untuk menjadi guru paud di kabupaten manggarai. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 10(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.36928/jpkm.v10i2.170

Syamsuddin, S., & Utami, M. A. P. (2023). Perspektif guru pada dimensi pengukuran dan penilaian dalam pembelajaran matematika. AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v12i1.9263

Valsiner, J. (1997). Culture and the development of children’s action: a theory of human development. John Wiley & Sons Inc.

VandenBos, G. R. (2007). Apa dictionary of psychology. American Psychological Association.

Werdiningsih, W., & Natsir, A. (2020). Gender equality and equity with mubadalah concept and its implementation in islamic education. Addin, 14(2), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v14i2.7179

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v13i2.20104