Integrating Triple-Bottom-Line Goals and Uncertainty in Aggregate Production Planning Using Fuzzy Goal Programming

Nabila Zakia Indra, Budi Santosa, Nurhadi Siswanto

Abstract


This study develops a Sustainable Aggregate Production Planning (SAPP) model based on Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP) that integrates economic, environmental, and social objectives under uncertainty. Conventional aggregate production planning primarily focuses on cost minimization, often resulting in excessive overtime, high emissions, and workforce instability. To address these limitations, the proposed model simultaneously considers total cost, carbon emissions, energy consumption, waste generation, workforce stability, and worker satisfaction within a unified fuzzy optimization framework. From a mathematical perspective, the main contribution of this study lies in the explicit formulation of a max–min FGP structure using aspiration-based linear membership functions for all sustainability objectives, enabling a balanced compromise solution without relying on deviation-variable-based goal programming commonly adopted in existing SAPP models. The resulting formulation is a linear mixed-integer optimization model that preserves tractability while accommodating conflicting sustainability goals. Numerical experiments are conducted using illustrative demand and operational data adapted from a reference study, solely for mathematical calibration and validation of the proposed model rather than empirical inference. The results indicate a global satisfaction level of λ = 0.67, representing a balanced max–min compromise among economic, environmental, and social objectives. Compared to the baseline scenario, the optimized plan achieves notable improvements in cost efficiency and waste reduction while keeping emissions, energy consumption, and workforce-related indicators within predefined fuzzy tolerance limits. Overall, the proposed SAPP–FGP model provides a transparent and flexible decision-support framework for sustainability-oriented production planning, offering clear insights into trade-offs among competing objectives and contributing to the applied mathematical literature on multi-objective production planning under uncertainty.


Keywords


Sustainable Aggregate Production Planning; Optimization; Triple Bottom Line; Fuzzy Goal Programming; Multi-objective Optimization

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Todescato et al., ‘Sustainable manufacturing through application of reconfigurable and intelligent systems in production processes: a system perspective’, Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 22374, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49727-5.

S. S. Islami, M. M. Pane, A. G. Salsabila, B. H. Sinawang, I. C. Tarabu, and L. F. Primaputra, ‘A Systematic Literature Review of Sustainable Manufacturing: Green Manufacturing Practices in Asia’, Indones. J. Comput. Eng. Des. IJoCED, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 102–117, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.35806/ijoced.v5i2.375.

A. Gunasekaran, Z. Irani, and T. Papadopoulos, ‘Modelling and analysis of sustainable operations management: certain investigations for research and applications’, J. Oper. Res. Soc., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 806–823, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1057/jors.2013.171.

A. Cheraghalikhani, F. Khoshalhan, and H. Mokhtari, ‘Aggregate production planning: A literature review and future research directions’, Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., pp. 309–330, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2018.6.002.

E. Koberg and A. Longoni, ‘A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 207, pp. 1084–1098, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.033.

R. Ghasemy Yaghin, P. Sarlak, and A. A. Ghareaghaji, ‘Robust master planning of a socially responsible supply chain under fuzzy-stochastic uncertainty (A case study of clothing industry)’, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 94, p. 103715, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103715.

A. Techawiboonwong and P. Yenradee, ‘Aggregate Production Planning Using Spreadsheet Solver: Model and Case Study’.

V. F. Yu, H.-C. Kao, F.-Y. Chiang, and S.-W. Lin, ‘Solving Aggregate Production Planning Problems: An Extended TOPSIS Approach’, Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 14, p. 6945, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12146945.

M. Trost, T. Claus, and F. Herrmann, ‘Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 8198, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14138198.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Indonesia (2022). National greenhouse gas inventory report. [Online]. Available: https://signsmart.menlhk.go.id/v2.1/app/

(Accessed: June. 15, 2025).

United Nations Industrial Development Organization, ‘Industrial Development Report 2022: The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World’, UNIDO Publications. [Online]. Available: https://decarbonization.unido.org/projects/iddi/

(Accessed: June. 15, 2025).

A. Banasik, A. Kanellopoulos, J. M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, and G. D. H. Claassen, ‘Accounting for uncertainty in eco-efficient agri-food supply chains: A case study for mushroom production planning’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 216, pp. 249–256, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.153.

A. Jabbarzadeh, M. Haughton, and F. Pourmehdi, ‘A robust optimization model for efficient and green supply chain planning with postponement strategy’, Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 214, pp. 266–283, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.013.

P. K. Kumawat, R. K. Sinha, and N. D. Chaturvedi, ‘Multi‐objective optimization for sustainable production planning’, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, vol. 40, no. 6, p. e13741, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1002/ep.13741.

S. Mehrbakhsh and V. Ghezavati, ‘Mathematical modeling for green supply chain considering product recovery capacity and uncertainty for demand’, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, no. 35, pp. 44378–44395, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10331-z.

M. Wang, B. Ye, S. Lin, C. Wang, and P. Zhang, ‘Sustainable supply chain planning with the flexible provisions of inter-period emission credits borrowing and banking under a multi-period carbon trading scheme’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 445, p. 141406, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141406.

M. Qasim and K. Y. Wong, ‘A fuzzy multi-objective model for aggregate production planning considering energy consumption, carbon emission, chemical, solid waste, and wastewater’, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 475, p. 143644, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143644.

S. M. Ahmed, T. K. Biswas, and C. K. Nundy, ‘An optimization model for aggregate production planning and control: a genetic algorithm approach’, Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.22105/riej.2019.192936.1090.

E. Guzman, B. Andres, and R. Poler, ‘Models and algorithms for production planning, scheduling and sequencing problems: A holistic framework and a systematic review’, J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 27, p. 100287, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100287.

M. H. Alavidoost, A. Jafarnejad, and H. Babazadeh, ‘A novel fuzzy mathematical model for an integrated supply chain planning using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm’, Soft Comput., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1777–1801, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05251-6.

T.-C. T. Chen and Y.-C. Wang, ‘A fuzzy mid-term capacity and production planning model for a manufacturing system with cloud-based capacity’, Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–85, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40747-020-00177-w.

B. K. Giri, S. K. Roy, and M. Deveci, ‘Fuzzy robust flexible programming with M e measure for electric sustainable supply chain’, Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 145, p. 110614, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110614.

Md. S. Uddin et al., “Goal programming tactic for uncertain multi-objective transportation problem using fuzzy linear membership function,” Alex. Eng. J., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 2525–2533, Apr. 2021,

doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.12.039.

G.-F. Yu and D.-F. Li, ‘A novel intuitionistic fuzzy goal programming method for heterogeneous MADM with application to regional green manufacturing level evaluation under multi-source information’, Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 174, p. 108796, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108796.

H. Zare, M. Kamali Saraji, M. Tavana, D. Streimikiene, and F. Cavallaro, ‘An Integrated Fuzzy Goal Programming—Theory of Constraints Model for Production Planning and Optimization’, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 22, p. 12728, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132212728.

M. Türkay, Ö. Saraçoğlu, and M. C. Arslan, ‘Sustainability in Supply Chain Management: Aggregate Planning from Sustainability Perspective’, PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 1, p. e0147502, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147502.

C. Gahm, F. Denz, M. Dirr, and A. Tuma, ‘Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 744–757, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.017.

J. M. R. C. Fernandes, S. M. Homayouni, and D. B. M. M. Fontes, ‘Energy-Efficient Scheduling in Job Shop Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 6264, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14106264.

K. Moon et al., ‘Manufacturing Productivity with Worker Turnover’, Manag. Sci., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1995–2015, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4476.

V. Wickramasinghe and G. L. D. Wickramasinghe, ‘Effects of HRM practices, lean production practices and lean duration on performance’, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag., vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1467–1512, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1407954.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/zero.v9i3.26953

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher :
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
📱 WhatsApp:085270009767 (Admin Official)
SINTA 2 Google Scholar CrossRef Garuda DOAJ