IMPLEMENTATION OF ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS & BEST WORST METHOD IN SUPPLIER SELECTION

Nanang Alamsyah; Mohammad Rachman Waluyo; Muthia Zenzy Ariani

doi:10.30829/zero.v6i2.14889

IMPLEMENTATION OF ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS & BEST WORST METHOD IN SUPPLIER SELECTION

Nanang Alamsyah, Mohammad Rachman Waluyo, Muthia Zenzy Ariani

Abstract

The incompatibility of the quality of the goods sent and the delay in delivery resulted in the company suffering losses and creating an unfavourable image in the company consumer's eyes. Both factors can be caused by error in the supplier selection process of raw material. The purpose of this research is to select the best supplier in the procurement process at the largest paper-producing company in Indonesia, which begins with determining the criteria that influence the selection of suppliers. The Analytical Hierarchy Process and the Best Worst Method were used in this study. Based on 4 personnel in the procurement department, 8 criteria were found for selecting suppliers with 3 alternative suppliers. The selected criteria are: Certificate Quality, Defect Rate, Offer Price, Discounts, Delivery Time, Order Fulfilment, Power Respond, and Work History. The offer price is the most important variable with a weight of 29.3%. Supplier A was selected with a score of 66.78%, while Supplier C became the second alternative priority and Supplier B became the third alternative priority.

Keywords

Suppliers Selection, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Best Worst Method (BWM).

Full Text:

PDF

References

I. Gabcanova, “Human Resources Key Performance Indicators,” Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 4, no. 1, 2012.

L. Kurniawan, Hermawaty and Y. Tresnawati, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Karet Komponen Kaca Mobil di Bintang Berlian Glass Bandung dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Jurnal Inform. dan Sist. Informasi, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 81-107, 2020.

N. Alamsyah, “Pengurutan Skala Prioritas Perspektif Balance Scorecard Dan KPI Perusahan Startup Dengan Metode AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Prosess),” Jurnal Teknik Ibnu Sina (JT-IBSI), vol. 1, no. 01, 2016.

O. S. Vaidya and S. Kumar, “Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006.

S. Moslem, D. Farooq, O. Ghorbanzadeh and T. Blaschke, “Application of the AHP-BWM model for evaluating driver behavior factors related to road safety: A case study for Budapest,” Symmetry, vol. 12, no. 2, 2020.

J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega, vol. 53, pp. 49-57, 2015.

N. S. Rezaur Rahman, M. A. A. Chowdhury, A. Firoze and R. M. Rahman, “Fusion of BWM and AHP MCDM Methods to Choose the Most Suitable Secondary School for an Individual in the Context of Bangladesh,” Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, vol. 6, no. 3, 2019.

S. Yin, L. Wu, L. Du and M. Chen, “Consumers' purchase intention of organic food in China,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 90, no. 8, 2010.

T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, 1990.

R. W. Saaty, “The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used,” Mathematical Modelling, vol. 9, no. 3-5, 1987.

F. Foroozesh, S. M. Monavari, A. Salmanmahiny, M. Robati and R. Rahimi, “Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS–GIS,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 76, 2022.

D. Winarso and F. Yasir, “Winarso, D., & YAsir, F. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Produk Receiver Parabola dan Kipas Angin Pada Toko Irsan Jaya Rangkuti Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” JURNAL FASILKOM (teknologi inFormASi dan ILmu KOMputer), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 464-475, 2019.

D. Pamučar and G. C. a. M. A. A. Fatih Ecer, “Application of improved best worst method (BWM) in real-world problems,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 1342, 2020.

J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model,” Omega, vol. 64, pp. 126-130, 2016.

J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega (United Kingdom), vol. 53, 2015.

M. Akbari, S. G. Meshram, R. S. Krishna, B. Pradhan, S. Shadeed, K. M. Khedher, M. Sepehri, A. R. Ildoromi, F. Alimerzaei and F. Darabi, “Identification of the Groundwater Potential Recharge Zones Using MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Best Worst Method (BWM) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Water Resources Management, vol. 35, no. 14, 2021.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/zero.v6i2.14889

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science and Technology
State Islamic University of North Sumatra
Campus IV Medan Tuntungan, North Sumatra, Indonesia

Email: mtk.saintek@uinsu.ac.id

Whatsapp Number : +62-857-8159-6797

Username
Password
Remember me