MODEL SOCIAL NETWORK EFFECT ON PRODUCT DESIGN
Abstract
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Balakrishnan, P. V., dan Jacob, V. S. (1996). Genetic algorithms for product design, Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 8, hal. 1105-1117, August Issue.
Bell, D.R.,dan S. Song. 2007. Neighborhood effects and trial on the internet: Evidence from online groceryretailing. Quantitative Marketing and Economic. Vol 5. hal 61-400.
Camm, J. D., Cochran, J. J., Curry, D. J., dan Kannan, S., Conjoint Optimization: An exact branch-and-bound algorithm for the Share of Choices problem, Working Paper, College of Business, University of Cincinnati, February 2006.
Chen, K. D., dan Hausman, W. H. (2000). Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, hal. 327-332, February Issue.
Green, P. E., dan Krieger, A. M. (1993). Conjoint analysis with product-positioning applications, Chapter 10, Handbooks in OR & MS, Vol. 5, hal. 467-515.
Green, P. E., Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice, Journal of Marketing, pp. 3-19, October Issue.
Kohli, R., dan Krishnamurti, R. (1987). A heuristic approach to product design, Management Science, Vol. 33, No. 12, hal. 1523-1533, December Issue.
Kohli, R., Krishnamurti, R. (1989). Optimal product design using conjoint analysis: Computational complexity and algorithms, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 40, hal. 186-195.
model social network effect on product design
Madyunus 10
Krieger, A. M., Green, P. E., Wind, Y. J. (2004). Adventures in Conjoint Analysis: A Practitioner’s Guide to Trade-Off Modeling and Applications, (download dari Prof. Green’s Official web-page).
Leenders, R.T., J. van Engelen, J. Kratzer. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. hal 69-92.
Iyengar, R., S. Han, S. Gupta. (2009). Do friends influence purchases in a social network? HarvardBusinessSchool Marketing Unit Working Paper No. 09. hal.123
Manchanda, P., Y. Xie, N. dan Youn. (2008). The role of targeted communication andcontagion in productadoption. Marketing Science vol.27 no.6. hal. 961-976.
McCullough, D. (2002). A user’s guide to conjoint analysis, Marketing Research, Vol. 14, No. 2.
Orme, B. (2003). Which conjoint method should I use? Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series.
Orme, B. (2005). Pedagogical material on Conjoint Analysis Methodology, Sawtooth Software Inc., (file di download dari www.sawtoothsoftware.com).
Shi, L., Olafsson, S. (2000). Nested partitions method for global optimization, Operations Research, Vol. 48, No. 3, hal. 390-407, May-June Issue.
Sosa, M.E., S.D. Eppinger, C.M. Rowles. 2004. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Science vol.50. no.12 hal 1674-1689.
Srinivasan, R., G.L. Lilien, A. Rangaswamy. (2004). First in, first out? The effects of network externalities onpioneer survival. Journal of Marketingvol.68, no.1. hal 41-58.
Tull, D. S., Hawkins, D.I. (2003). Marketing Research – Measurement & Method, 6thEdition, Prentice Hall of India.
Wind, J., (1982). Product Policy: Concepts, Methods and Strategy, Chapter 10, hal. 290- 293.
Yoo, D., Ohta, H. (1995). Optimal pricing and product-planning for new multiattributeproducts based on conjoint analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 38, hal. 245-253.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/zero.v1i1.1453
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Email: mtk.saintek@uinsu.ac.id