MEMBANGUN RELASI UMAT BERAGAMA PASCA KONFLIK AGAMA DI TANJUNGBALAI
Abstract
In order to create relations between religious communities on the basis of tolerance, it is very important to intensify dialogue between religious communities. Because dialogue is an appropriate resolution in building peace between religious communities. The research results found in this paper related to the post conflict that occurred in Tanjungbalai City is a bridge in creating harmony by fostering tolerance, caring for others and increasing solidarity among fellow communities in Tanjungbalai. This research is a field research. This research emphasizes the function of theory as a tool to sharpen the sensitivity of researchers in seeing religious conflicts in Tanjungbalai and formulating Johan Galtung's conflict triangle theory (peace keeping, peace making and peace building) as a means of building good relations after conflict. The purpose of this study is to build relationships between religious communities in the Tanjungbalai community by removing the truth claim of a religion, feeling suspicious and trying to be inclusive in religion. With this effort, it is expected that a harmonious relationship between religious communities will be created after the Burning of the Vihara in Tanjungbalai.
Keywords: Relationships, Religious People and Post-ConflictFull Text:
PDFReferences
Daftar Pustaka
Arikunto, Suharsimi,. (1985). MetodologiPenelitianKualitatif. Bandung: RinekaCipta.
Daya, Burhanuddin dan Amin Abdullah. (2010). Kuliah Umum Dialog Lintas Agama dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Prodi Agama dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Habib, Achmad,. (2004). Konflik Antar Etnik di Pedesaan: Pasang Surut Hubungan Cina-Jawa. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Hendropuspito, D. (1983). Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Herimanto dan Winarno. (2014). Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Hugh Miall. (2000). Resolusi Damai Konflik Kontemporer: Menyelesaikan, Mencegah, Melola dan Mengubah Konflik Bersumber Politik, Sosial, Agama dan Ras. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
K. Garna, Judistira. (1992). Teori-teori Perubahan Sosial. Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Padjajaran.
Kartono, Kartini. (1990). Pengantar Metodologi Riset Sosial, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Madjid, Nurcholis. (1999). Islam Doktrin dan Peradaban. Jakarta Selatan: Pramadina.
Mizuno, Kogen dan Litt. D. (1989). Primitive Buddhism, Jepang: Kosei Publishing Company.
Muhadjir, Noeng. (1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Mulyana, Deddy dan Solatun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Contoh-Contoh Penelitian Kualitatif dengan Pendekatan Kritis. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Munawar, Budhy dan Rahmat. (2007). Islam dan Pluralisme. Jakarta: Paramadika.
Rahmad, Jalaluddin. (1984). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi Dilengkapi Contoh Analisis Statistik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ritzer, George. (1992). Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta. Rajawali Pers.
Saidurrahman, Arifinsyah. (2018). Nalar Kerukunan (Merawat Keragaman Bangsa Mengawal NKRI). Medan: Perdana Publishing.
Syafuan Rozi, dkk. (2006). Kekerasan Komunal: Anatomi dan Resolusi Konflik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yulius Hermawan. (2007). Transformasi dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional: Aktor, Isu dan Metodologi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51900/ssr.v3i1.7670
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Studia Sosia Religia
About the Journal | Journal Policies | Author | Information |
|
|
Studia Sosia Religia: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama
e-ISSN: 2622-2019
Website: http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/ssr/index
Email: studiasosiareligia@uinsu.ac.id
Published by: FUSI UIN SU Medan
Office: Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Islam UIN Sumatera Utara Medan, Jl. Williem Iskandar Pancing Medan, Pasar V Medan Estate» Tel /fax : 0616622925 /