Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

This journal publishes research relevant to the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings into routine community service and empowerment practices, specifically within the context of Islamic integration and coastal communities.

Applied health-related research consistently generates new findings, yet these are often not routinely translated into community service practice. Implementation research is the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of proven clinical treatments, practices, organizational, and management interventions into routine practice, thereby improving community health and well-being. This scope also encompasses the de-implementation of interventions demonstrated to be of low or no community benefit, as well as the study of influences on community target behavior, health professionals, and organizational behavior within community service contexts.

The lack of routine uptake of research findings is strategically important for the development of public health because it clearly imposes an invisible ceiling on research’s potential to enhance health. Furthermore, it is scientifically crucial as it identifies the behavior of service professionals and organizations as key sources of variance requiring improved empirical and theoretical understanding before effective uptake can be reliably achieved.

Implementation science is an inherently interdisciplinary research area, and this journal is not constrained by any particular research tradition. The journal publishes articles of high scientific rigor, utilizing the most appropriate methods to produce valid, generalizable answers to research questions.

While the Journal primarily focuses on community service activities integrating Islamic principles and coastal communities, we are also open to rigorous community service and empowerment activities in the fields of:

  • Public Health

  • Medicine

  • Nursing

  • Midwifery, and

  • Other Health Professions

In addition to hosting papers describing the effectiveness of implementation interventions, the Journal provides a unique home for rigorous, large-scale intervention development, evaluations of the process by which effects are achieved, economic evaluations of implementation, and the role of theory relevant to implementation research. The journal is also interested in publishing articles that present novel methods (particularly those that have a theoretical basis) for studying implementation processes and interventions. We are also interested in receiving articles that address methodologically robust studies of the de-implementation of ineffective clinical and organizational practices.

We welcome study protocols of large and innovative research, but these will only be considered if the study is received within 12 months of ethics approval and has been approved for funding through external peer review by an established national funding body in the respective country. We do not consider protocols for systematic reviews.

We are advocates for theoretically informed research. When deploying specific theories and frameworks in studies, the rationale for their use needs to be convincingly presented. We also expect authors to ensure that these are not applied in a superficial or tokenistic fashion. Instead, we recommend an in-depth engagement with selected theories and frameworks throughout the manuscript. Theories and frameworks should explicitly inform research aims and objectives, guide data collection and data analysis, shape the presentation of findings, and provide a basis for articulating the study’s contribution in the discussion section.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

This journal employs a rigorous, multi-stage peer review system designed to ensure the quality and scholarly suitability of all published manuscripts.

I. Initial Assessment and Desk Review

All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation for adherence to the journal's submission guidelines and scope. Submissions failing to meet these preliminary requirements will be returned to the author for necessary revisions. The journal reserves the right to desk reject (reject without external peer review) manuscripts deemed unsuitable or out of scope at this stage.

II. Review Methodology: Double-Anonymized

The journal strictly adheres to a double-anonymized review policy. This protocol ensures complete mutual concealment of identities: the authors' identities are hidden from the reviewers, and the reviewers' identities are hidden from the authors. Reviewers communicate their assessments and recommendations exclusively through the editorial team (Editor-in-Chief/Associate Editor/Editorial Assistant). The journal maintains full confidentiality, as no information regarding the peer review process (including reviewer comments or identity) is made public alongside the final published article.

III. Review Requirements and Decision

  • Standard Review: A minimum of two independent peer reviews is generally required before a manuscript can receive a decision of "Revise" or "Accept."

  • Exceptions: Certain manuscript types, such as Editorials and Viewpoints, may be accepted without requiring two independent reviews. A third reviewer may be consulted if additional expertise is necessary.

  • Final Authority: Reviewers provide comments to the author and recommendations to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and Associate Editors/Editorial Assistant, who retain the final decision-making authority on all submissions, including those designated for special issues or collections.

  • Reviewer Assignment: To uphold the integrity of the process, the journal assigns reviewers and cannot accept author recommendations for reviewers.

IV. Ethical Policy for Editorial Submissions

To maintain objectivity and prevent conflicts of interest, any manuscript submitted by an Editor or Editorial Board member will have its peer review process managed by alternative, non-submitting members of the Board. The submitting Editor or Board member will be strictly excluded from the decision-making process for their own manuscript.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...