.png)
Reconceptualizing Fiduciary Guarantee Execution After Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Ruling
Abstract
The Constitutional Court Decisions No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and No. 71/PUU-XIX/2021 have reshaped the legal framework of fiduciary guarantee execution in Indonesia by mandating court involvement and debtor consent in cases of default. This study examines the legal reasoning behind these decisions and their implications for the executorial nature of fiduciary certificates. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research finds that these rulings redefine fiduciary certificates from self-executing instruments to legal documents requiring judicial validation. While this shift enhances procedural justice and debtor protection, it also undermines the efficiency of extrajudicial enforcement, which has been a core feature of fiduciary law. The transformation introduces legal uncertainty for creditors relying on the swift enforcement previously granted by fiduciary titles. The findings suggest the need for a normative reconstruction of the fiduciary execution mechanism to harmonize constitutional values, procedural fairness, and the principle of legal certainty.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustinus Sihombing, Ranat Mulia Pardede, Fahmi Amrico, Herman, Eko Murti Saputra, Armansyah, & Heru Iskhan. (2023). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Cv. Azka Pustaka. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=WCnKEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA2&dq=Menurut+Satjipto+Rahardjo,+perlindungan+hukum+adalah+upaya+untuk+menjamin+agar+individu+yang+dirugikan+haknya+oleh+pihak+lain+dapat+memperoleh+kembali+hak+tersebut+secara+adil+melalui+proses+hukum&ots=4i6g3KFGiG&sig=KhEFYvXlU_vWiwnbIO19WyCko3I&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Ahmad, A., Fachrurrazy, M., S, S. Y. H., Amalia, M., Fauzi, E., Gaol, S. L., Siliwadi, D. N., & Takdir, T. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian & Penulisan Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=_-gEEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=metode+penelitian+:+bahan+hukum+primer,+sekunder,+dan+tersier+buku&ots=mORm1A8UHL&sig=_w07GryAtWYoztMqzp4amnvHBK8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Andalusia, A. (2025). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 71/PUU-XIX/2021 di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(5), 4189–4201. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i5.4868
Asnul. (2020). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019: Apa Implikasinya Bagi Proses Bisnis Lelang? https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-bekasi/baca-artikel/12953/PUTUSAN-MAHKAMAH-KONSTITUSI-NOMOR-18PUU-XVII2019-APA-IMPLIKASINYA-BAGI-PROSES-BISNIS-LELANG.html
Audia, S., Fitrian, A., & Pandiangan, R. (2023). Interpretasi Yuridis Atas Uji Materi Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Terkait Terbitnya Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.47492/jih.v12i2.3111
Cintiadewi, I. A. C., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Astiti, N. G. K. S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris dalam Melegalisasi Akta Dibawah Tangan yang menjadi Objek Sengketa. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 1(1), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.1.2006.189-194
Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum. (2022). Masyarakat Perlu Tahu !!! Ini Efektivitas Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://portal.ahu.go.id/id/detail/75-berita-lainnya/3002-masyarakat-perlu-tahu-ini-efektivitas-pendaftaran-jaminan-fidusia-pasca-putusan-mahkamah-konstitusi
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=metode+penelitian+hukum+normatif&ots=6962g6y-lZ&sig=5n-XIlm57ebsHFMxPpHdxCACojc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Faiz, P. M. (2009). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice). Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(1), 135–149. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2847573
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/peraturan/detail/11ead07d33892490bcb8303935313134.html
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2021). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 71/PUU-XIX/2021. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_8359_1645680324.pdf
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi. (2022). Eksekusi Jaminan Objek Fidusia Harus Melalui Pengadilan Negeri. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=18015&menu=2
Junaedi, B., Tjoanda, M., & Berlianty, T. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum pada Debitur atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia melalui Parate Eksekusi. PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433
Lumbanraja, E. D. T., Fauzi, A. P., Sabila, B. A., & Firdaus, M. A. N. (2023). Eksekusi Benda Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konseptual Dalam Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 5(2), 132–150. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/18461
Meiliana, B. C. (2021). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18 / PUU- XVII / 2019 Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dikaitkan Dengan Penafsiran Wanprestasi pada Perjanjian Fidusia [Universitas Negeri Surakarta]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/84357/Implikasi-Putusan-Mahkamah-Konstitusi-Nomor-18-PUU-XVII-2019-Terhadap-Eksekusi-Objek-Jaminan-Fidusia-Dikaitkan-Dengan-Penafsiran-Wanprestasi-pada-Perjanjian-Fidusia
Nikodemus Sigit Rahardjo. (2024). Penerapan E-Government di Negara Berkembang: Analisis Kesediaan Membayar Warga untuk Layanan Publik Digital (Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur) Nikodemus Sigit Rahardjo. Link: Https://Www. Djkn. Kemenkeu. Go. Id/Artikel/Baca/17381/Penerapan-E-Government-Di-Negara-Berkembang-Analisis-Kesediaan. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/17381/Penerapan-E-Government-di-Negara-Berk
Nugraha, S. N. (2021). Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213
Oktavira, B. A. O. (2023, January 3). Arti Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/ius-constitutum-dan-ius-constituendum-lt56777c031ec1c/
Prayoga, D. A., Husodo, J. A., & Maharani, A. E. P. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Warga Negara Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional. Sovereignty, 2(2), Article 2. https://journal.uns.ac.id/index.php/sovereignty/article/view/865
Riskawati, S. (2021). Rasio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan Perubahan Konstruksi Norma Eksekusi dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i1.613
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). CV Widina Media Utama. https://repository.penerbitwidina.com/publications/564622/
Saleem, N. (2021). Rawls’ Theory Of Justice. IJCRT - International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 13(6), 1628. https://mail.ijcrt.org/viewfull.php?&p_id=IJCRT2101194
Samudra, M. T. (2022). Taradhin Principle in Fiduciary Guarantee Parate Execution after the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v20i1.5992
Shalihah, U. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU-XIX/2021 Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Bagi Para Pihak [Masters, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang]. https://eprints.umm.ac.id/id/eprint/15146/
Sitinjak, E. E. (2024). Mekanisme Pengaturan Parate Eksecutie Terhadap Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/PUU-XVII/2019 [Masters, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang]. https://repository.unissula.ac.id/35451/
Supriyadi, S. (2020). Reconstruction of the Guarantee’s Objects in the Fiduciary Agreement in Indonesia. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, Extra 1, 260–271. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7408886
Suryandari, W. D. (2023). Ratio Legis Putusan €“Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvh-2019 Tentang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v4i1.459
Suyanto, S. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Vidyasagara, I. P. B., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2023). Legal Protection for Debtors for the Execution of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects. 721, 460–469. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_55
Wardani, K. (2024). Parate Execution After the Indonesian Constitutional Court’s Judicial Review of Fiducia Law and Mortgage Law. Global Legal Review, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.19166/glr.v4i1.6628
Wirawan, A. (2022). Reformulasi Atas Lelang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 71/PUU-XIX/2021. Indonesian Rich Journal, 3(2), Article 2. https://irich.pknstan.ac.id/irj/article/view/43
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.25054
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
