The Dynamics of the Death Penalty as a Deterrent or Preventive Tool

Muhammad Saleh, Calvin Calvin

Abstract


Death penalty is the most extreme punishment imposed by a country's legal system against perpetrators of certain crimes. In the context of the dynamics of criminal law, there are arguments stating that the death penalty has a role as a deterrence or prevention tool against crime. This paper explores the dynamics of the death penalty as a deterrence or preventive tool in the context of the legal system, with a focus on controversy, effectiveness, and implications in law enforcement. Various opinions and studies support and oppose the effectiveness of death penalty as a deterrence tool. Some argue that the death penalty can reduce the level of crime due to the potential for serious consequences, thus preventing others from committing similar crimes. However, other opinions indicate that there is no strong empirical evidence to support the claim that the death penalty is truly effective in reducing crime rates. Some studies even show that other factors such as prevention policies, rehabilitation, and improvement of social conditions are more influential in reducing crime than the threat of the death penalty. The controversy surrounding the death penalty also involves ethical considerations, human rights, and principles of justice. The death penalty is often considered a violation of human rights, especially the right to life which is considered an inviolable human right. In addition, the risk of error in law enforcement is also a major concern, where systematic errors can result in the execution of innocent people. The implication of death penalty dynamics as a deterrence tool also involves aspects of public policy and social change. Some countries have abolished death penalty as a step towards more humane justice and fairer legal system. Meanwhile, other countries continue to maintain the death penalty as part of their legal system, although controversies and challenges continue to arise in the application and justification of the punishment. In conclusion, the dynamics of the death penalty as a deterrence tool is still a complex and controversial topic in the study of criminal law and policy. Although some opinions support its effectiveness in deterring crime, there are also many arguments and evidence to the contrary. Therefore, there is a need for more in-depth studies and strong empirical evidence to better understand the role and impact of death penalty in society and legal system.


Keywords


death penalty; deterrence; dynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hamdiah, E., & Yuliantari, A. P. (2022). POLA PIKIR RELIGIUS-HUMANIS SEORANG ABOLITIONIST DALAM NOVEL UNCLE TOM’S CABIN KARYA HARRIET BEECHER STOWE. PROLITERA: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 5(1), 30–49.

Hutapea, B. (2017). Alternatif Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dilihat Dari Perspektif Ham (Alternative of Death Penalty of Human Rights Perspective, in Indonesia). Jurnal HAM, 7(2), 69–83.

Irpan, Y. B. (2017). EKSISTENSI PIDANA MATI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Wacana Hukum, 23(1).

Izad, R. (2019). Pidana Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Etika Deontologi. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 1(1).

Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., Johnny Ibrahim, S. H., & Se, M. M. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris. Prenada Media.

Mahmud, A. (2021). PROBLEMA PIDANA MATI TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAMSISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 456–471.

Siallagan, A., Sianturi, B. G. D., Sinaga, E., & Manalu, S. A. R. (2023). Peran Hukum Islam dalam Mempengaruhi Tradisi Hukum Gantung di Aceh: Studi Kasus Syariat Islam di Aceh. JUPSHU: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Dan Hukum, 1(2), 90–99.

Sida, E. M. E. L. (2020). Kriminologi, Viktimologi dan Filsafat Hukum (KVFH). Guepedia.

Widayati, L. S. (2017). Pidana Mati Dalam Ruu Kuhp: Perlukah Diatur Sebagai Pidana Yang Bersifat Khusus?(Death Penalty In The Bill Of Criminal Code: Should Regulated As A Special Punishment?). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 7(2), 167–194.

WP, Z. W. A., & Adam, H. (2014). Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perkara Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang. Yuridika, 29(2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v4i2.21451

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Saleh, Calvin Calvin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons

Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.