UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS EXTENDED COGNITION: AN INTERPRETATIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF LIS GRADUATE STUDENTS
Abstract
This study examines how graduate students in Library and Information Science (LIS) in Indonesia experience generative artificial intelligence (AI) in their academic work and how disciplinary and professional backgrounds shape that experience. Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), six LIS master's students who regularly used AI for academic purposes took part in semi-structured interviews. Analysis involved initial noting, case-level theme development, within-case interpretation, and cross-case comparison. Four themes were developed: AI as epistemic infrastructure; efforts to preserve cognitive autonomy amid dependency; AI as both a cognitive and affective space; and the uneven influence of LIS-related professional dispositions.Two recurring patterns were also identified. Epistemic hierarchy reversal describes participants' tendency to consult AI before conventional sources, while evaluative offloading refers to cases in which AI became a reference point for judging one's own ideas. The interviews were consistent with cognitive offloading and, in some cases, possible cognitive coupling, but participants also described deliberate efforts to protect authorship, independent judgment, and cognitive boundaries. LIS-related habits appeared in verification, citation, information organization, and ethical reflection, although not uniformly. The study adds an idiographic account of how generative AI can become woven into academic thinking without assuming that routine use is equivalent to extended cognition. It also points to practical questions for LIS education around information evaluation, authorship, and ethical use of AI
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Clark, A. (2025). Extending minds with generative AI. Nature Communications, 16(1), 4627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59906-9
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Coeckelbergh, M. (2026). AI and epistemic agency: How AI influences belief revision and its normative implications. Social Epistemology, 40(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2466164
Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP, 119, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.05.002
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Floridi, L. (2023). AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy & Technology, 36(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hernández-Orallo, J. (2025). Enhancement and assessment in the AI age: An extended mind perspective. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 19, 18344909241309376. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909241309376
Hossain, Z., Alwreikat, A., Khan, G., Alotaibi, F. A. A., Biswas, M. S., & Sbeity, F. (2025). AI literacy and perception among library and information science students in South Asia and the Middle East. Science & Technology Libraries, 44(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2025.2484280
Jha, S. K. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence in libraries and information centers services: Prospects and challenges. Library Hi Tech News, 40(7), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-06-2023-0102
Johnson, S., Owens, E., Menendez, H., & Kim, D. (2024). Using ChatGPT-generated essays in library instruction. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(2), 102863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102863
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
LaFlamme, K. A. (2025). Scaffolding AI literacy: An instructional model for academic librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(3), 103041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103041
Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
Nazeer, S., Sumbal, M. S., Liu, G., Munir, H., & Tsui, E. (2025). The next big thing: Role of ChatGPT in personal knowledge management challenges and opportunities for knowledge workers across diverse disciplines. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(7–8), 2255–2269. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-07-2023-0246
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
Rezaei, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in knowledge management: Identifying and addressing the key implementation challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 217, 124183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124183
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Rivera-Novoa, A., & Duarte Arias, D. A. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence and extended cognition in science learning contexts. Science & Education, 35, 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00660-1
Sabu, F. X., & Asmiyanto, T. (2026). Rethinking moral agency: Luciano Floridi and the ethics of AI in the age of ChatGPT. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan, 14(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v14i1a5
Sidorkin, A. M. (2025). Extended executive cognition, a learning outcome for the AI age. Computers and Education Open, 9, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100294
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE.
Telakivi, P., Kokkonen, T., Hakli, R., & Mäkelä, P. (2026). AI-extended moral agency? Social Epistemology, 40(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2472759
Tollon, F. (2021). Do others mind? Moral agents without mental states. South African Journal of Philosophy, 40(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2021.1925841
Watson, A. P. (2024). Hallucinated citation analysis: Delving into student-submitted AI-generated sources at the University of Mississippi. The Serials Librarian, 85(5–6), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2024.2433640
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v11i2.31692
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Saiful Alam, Arie Nugraha, Muhamad Prabu Wibowo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









_1.png)
.png)
_.png)

