GEN Z’S INFORMATION BEHAVIOR IN THE ERA OF AI: A STUDY APPLYING WILSON’S THEORY (CASE STUDY IN JAVA ISLAND)

Aam Mariyamah, Majidah Majidah

Abstract


Information behavior refers to all activities related to human interaction with information. Generation Z (Gen Z), the generation born in the technological era, is no stranger to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in their daily lives. This study aims to analyze Gen Z's information behavior in this AI era from the perspective of Wilson's Information Behavior Theory (1996). The variables examined include passive attention, passive search, active search, and ongoing search information behaviors. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and inferentially using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with the help of SPSS 26.0 software The research instrument used an online questionnaire. The research respondents consisted of 260 Gen Zers spread across the island of Java. Respondents came from diverse demographic backgrounds, such as freelancers, students, and housewives. The results of the study show that demographic differences did not significantly affect AI usage patterns, as the majority of respondents (77.5%) chose AI personalization on social media as the most frequently used AI. Further findings show that the average values for information behavior are passive attention at 4.05, passive search at 3.91, active search at 4.04, and ongoing search at 3.97. This indicates that Gen Z in the AI era has a fairly balanced pattern of information behavior. They are not only passive in interacting with information that often comes by chance through social media algorithms, but also actively search for information when needed through search engines. Overall, this study shows that AI-based digital environment factors have a stronger influence than demographic factors in shaping Gen Z's information behavior. This also shows the relevance and expansion of the application of Wilson's Theory (1996) in the context of AI.

Keywords


Artificial Intelligence; Gen Z; Information Behavior; Wilson's Theory (1996)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Suqri, M. N., & Al-Aufi, A. S. (2015). Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption.

A’yun, M. Q. (2025). Memahami Generasi Z: Tantangan, Perilaku, dan Peluang. BPS Kabupaten Gorontalo. https://gorontalokab.bps.go.id/id/news/2025/02/05/30/memahami-generasi-z--tantangan--perilaku--dan-peluang.html

Babbie, E. R. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Cengage Learning Custom Publishing.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Jumlah Penduduk menurut Wilayah, Klasifikasi Generasi, dan Jenis Kelamin, Indonesia, Tahun 2020. http://sensus.bps.go.id/topik/tabular/sp2020/2?share=1

Caesarani, E. E., & Suharso, P. (2024). Perilaku Informasi Generasi Z Melalui Akun Autobase Kuliner dalam Media Sosial X. ANUVA, 8(2), 227–240.

Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2nd ed). Elsevier/Academic Press.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford Univ. Press.

Das, A. K., & Mandal, S. (2021). User Information needs and Information Seeking Behaviour of Physics Department at the University of Burdwan. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1,1-25.

De Spiegeleire, S., Maas, M., & Sweijs, T. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Defense: Strategic Implications for Small- and Medium-Sized Force Providers. He Hague Centre for Strategic Studies. http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep12564.7

Erdelez, S. (1995). Information encountering: An exploration beyond information seeking [Syracuse University]. https://surface.syr.edu/it_etd/38

Febriana, AD & Syam, AM. (2025). Enhancing student visits through library strategies: A case study of SMKN 1 Percut Sei Tuan. Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science 5 (3), 238-250

Ghozali, G. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hirvonen, N., Jylhä, V., Lao, Y., & Larsson, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the information ecosystem: Affordances for everyday information seeking. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(10), 1152–1165. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24860

Hu, A., & Ou, M. (2025). From passive to active: How does algorithm awareness affect users’ news seeking behavior on digital platforms. Telematics and Informatics, 100, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102291

Izzati, D. R. (2025). Information Search Behavior Of International Special Collections At The University Of Indonesia Library. 10(1). https://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/22665/10004

Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025; Indonesia. Datareportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Khairifa, F., Kholil, S., Syam, AM & Mujtahid, NM. (2025). Mitigating food waste and household waste management: The potential for redistributing surplus food in the policy communication of Medan City government. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1445 (1), 012047

Komara, D. A., & Widjaya, S. N. (2024). Memahami Perilaku Informasi Gen-Z dan Strategi Melawan Disinformasi: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Penggunaan Media Sosial. Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah, 10(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpi.v10i2.85775

Li, Y., Ring, J. K., Jin, D., & Bajaba, S. (2025). Elevating entrepreneurship with generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(6), 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100820

Maceviciute, E. (2025). Information management according to Professor Wilson. Information Research an International Electronic Journal, 30(2), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30253981

Marjerison, R. K., Jun, J. Y., & Kim, J. M. (2025). Socio-Technical Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurial Intention: The Impact of Generational Differences, Artificial Intelligence Familiarity, and Social Proximity. Systems, 13(7), 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070616

Masrek , M. N. ., Baharuddin , M. F. ., & Syam , A. M. . (2025). Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use Generative AI: The Role of Trust, Personal Innovativeness, and UTAUT II Factors. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(4), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.14419/44tk8615

Mumtazien, G & Syam, AM. (2024). Peran Perpustakaan Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Membaca Siswa. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal 6 (11), 5782–5793

Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things (Rev. and expanded edition). MIT press.

Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubbble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.

Ruan, Q. (2025). A philosophical perspective on constructing an information literacy education framework to foster college students’ complex thinking skills. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1409. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05760-5

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (with Chang, M., Devlin, J., Dragan, A., Forsyth, D., Goodfellow, I., Malik, J., Mansinghka, V., Pearl, J., & Wooldridge, M. J.). (2022). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Fourth edition, global edition). Pearson.

Ritonga, A. R., Education, I. R., Zein, A., Syam, A. M., & Ohorella, N. R. (2023). Misconceptions of Jihad: A Constructivist Review of the Meaning of Struggle in Islam in the Modern Era: Analysis of the verses al-Amwaal wa al-Nafs.

Sayekti, R., Batubara, A. K., Aditya, M., Purwaningtyas, F., & Syam, A. M. (2021). When the" Library as Place" Matters: A Case Study of an Academic Library. Library Philosophy & Practice.

Sekar Arum, L., Amira Zahrani, & Duha, N. A. (2023). Karakteristik Generasi Z dan Kesiapannya dalam Menghadapi Bonus Demografi 2030. Accounting Student Research Journal, 2(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.62108/asrj.v2i1.5812

St. Jean, B., Gorham, U., & Bonsignore, E. (2021). Understanding human information behavior: When, how, and why people interact with information. Rowman & Littlefield.

Sun, H., & Adnan, H. M. (2025). Exploring the Differences in Information Encountering Among Young Users of Mobile Social Media in China Under Different Moods. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(3), 111. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i3.7582

Wang, X., Wuji, S., Li, M., Liu, Y., & Luo, R. (2026). Social impact of recommendation algorithm in crisis: Forming algorithmic experience through group information interaction and algorithm task fit. Information Processing & Management, 63(1), 104323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104323

Wardi, R. H., Hassan, M. H., Mohd Yusof, U. Z., & Rosman, R. (2025). Gen Z’s Learning Preferences In Creative Design: A Conceptual Framework. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.771

Widiyastuti, W. (2016). Perbandingan Teori Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Menurut Ellis, Wilson Dan Kuhlthau. Jurnal Pustaka Budaya, 3(2), 51–64.

Wulandari, DA & Syam, AM. (2025). Analysis of The Availability of Braille Collections at The Public Library of Deli Serdang Regency Based on The Needs of The Visually Impaired. LITERACY: International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities 3 (3), 76-82




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v10i2.25964

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Aam Mariyamah, Majidah Majidah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
  
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
 
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/jipi/ 
 
Publisher:
Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara