SOCIO-COGNITIVE DIMENSIONS OF DEVELOPMENTALIST DISCOURSE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF THE IBU KOTA NUSANTARA RELOCATION

Aura Rahma Azzahra

Abstract


The relocation of Indonesia’s national capital from Jakarta to Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) in East Kalimantan has emerged as a prominent developmentalist project that embodies competing visions of national progress, environmental sustainability, and political legitimacy. This study aims to examine how Indonesian online media construct and contest the meaning of the IKN project through discourse. The research employs Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) using Teun A. Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach, which integrates textual structures, social cognition, and power relations. A qualitative case study design is applied to news articles published by Tempo.co and Kompas.com between early 2024 and early 2025. The analysis is conducted at three levels: macrostructure (global themes), superstructure (news schemata), and microstructure (lexical, syntactic, and rhetorical features), while also considering mental models and ideological positioning. The findings indicate a consistent pattern of discursive divergence between the two media outlets. Kompas.com predominantly constructs IKN through a developmentalist discourse emphasizing national progress, modernization, and economic opportunity, thereby legitimizing state developmentalist ideology. In contrast, Tempo.co constructs a critical narrative that emphasizes environmental degradation, fiscal risk, and democratic deficits, functioning as discursive resistance to state power. The study concludes that Indonesian media do not merely report the IKN relocation but potentially contribute to the formation of public mental models and social representations of national development. The research implies that critical media literacy is essential for democratic accountability, as large-scale state projects are increasingly legitimized or contested through strategic language use in digital media.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlstrand, J. L. (2021). Strategies of ideological polarisation in the online news media: A social actor analysis of Megawati Soekarnoputri. Discourse & Society, 32(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520961634

Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre

Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.

Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.

Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.

Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hidayah, F. N., Purnomo, M. D., & Daulay, S. H. (2025). Multimodality in the English textbook images: Gender representation analysis. Getsempena English Education Journal, 12(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v12i1.3190

IKN Authority. (2024). Development of Nusantara continues to progress: Investment reaches IDR 51.35 trillion. https://www.ikn.go.id/en/development-of-nusantara-continues-to-progress-investment-reaches-idr-5135-trillion

KhosraviNik, M. (2020). Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683

KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582–596). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Moon, R. (2021). When journalists see themselves as villains: The power of negative discourse. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3), 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020985465

Nasution, N. E. A. (2024). Development of a digital escape room-assisted e-book in environmental science courses. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 5(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v5i2.210

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Purnomo, M. D. (2019). Kuasa bahasa: Wacana, kekuasaan, dan ideologi dalam komunikasi politik dan pendidikan. Author.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). Sage.

Tartory, R. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of online publications ideology: A case of Middle Eastern online publications. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941471

Tempo.co. (2024). Empty words about Nusantara forest city. https://en.tempo.co/read/1844397/empty-words-about-nusantara-forest-city

Tempo.co. (2024). The IKN should stop here. https://en.tempo.co/read/2038121/the-ikn-should-stop-here

Tempo.co. (2025). Why immediate evaluation of the capital relocation to IKN is crucial. https://en.tempo.co/read/2038892/why-immediate-evaluation-of-the-capital-relocation-to-ikn-is-crucial

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499

van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986

Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: The shameless normalization of far-right discourse (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529758283

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage.

Xiong, H., Liu, X., & He, Y. (2021). Claiming legitimacy: Journalists’ discursive strategies for rationalizing “brand propaganda” within Chinese local press. Journalism Studies, 22(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1880335




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/inspiration.v5i1.27912

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexed by: