Email this article OPTIMIZATION OF MEDIATION IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES: EFFORTS TO REALIZE THE PROTECTION AND BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD
Abstract
Child custody disputes following divorce frequently neglect the fundamental rights and psychological well being of the child, resulting in prolonged legal battles that prioritize parental ego over child welfare. This study aims to extensively analyze the optimization of the mediation process in child custody disputes as a primary and indispensable instrument to realize the legal protection and the best interests of the child. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this study reviews relevant literature, Supreme Court regulations (PERMA No. 1 of 2016), and recent jurisprudential developments. The results indicate that while litigation ends in adversarial win-lose outcomes, mediation provides a collaborative, non-litigation alternative that fosters rational decision-making and sustainable parenting arrangements. Statistical and jurisprudential analysis reveals that successful mediation significantly reduces post-divorce conflict and ensures continuity in child development. This research introduces a novel framework by integrating therapeutic and facilitative mediation models specifically tailored for Indonesian courts, addressing the current gap in mediator competence and psychological intervention. In conclusion, optimizing mediation requires specialized training for mediators in child psychology and a mandatory, structured pre-mediation phase. It is highly recommended that future policies mandate psychological assessment as an integral part of the mediation process to strictly uphold the child's best interests
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aditya, M., & Susanti, R. (2025). The Psychological Impact of Child Custody Disputes on Early Childhood Development: A Legal and Psychological Synthesis. Journal of Gender and Child Studies, 12(1), 45–60.
Anwar, C., & Lestari, D. (2024). Post Divorce Co-Parenting: Legal Frameworks, Judicial Realities, and the Role of Mediation in Indonesia. Journal of Family Studies, 11(1), 22–39.
Baharuddin, R., & Mulyani, S. (2025). Protecting Children from Parental Alienation Syndrome Through Early and Mandatory Therapeutic Mediation. Child Psychology and Law Review, 7(4), 280–296.
Baskoro, B., & Wulandari, A. (2024). Supreme Court Decisions on Child Custody: A Decade in Review and the Shift Towards Alternative Dispute Resolution. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 8(2), 112–130.
Cahya, D., & Pratama, H. (2025). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Modern Trends, Enduring Challenges, and the Future of Islamic Courts in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 15(3), 200–215.
Dewi, R., & Santoso, B. (2026). The Essential Role of Certified Non-Judicial Mediators in Religious Courts: An Empirical Study in North Sumatra. Sumatra Law Review, 5(1), 10–25.
Fajar, A., & Siregar, R. (2024). Facilitative versus Evaluative Mediation in Child Custody Battles: Which Model Truly Serves the Child? Asian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 7(4), 310–325.
Firmansyah, D., & Oktavia, R. (2026). The Effectiveness of Online Mediation (E Mediation) and Digital Caucus Mechanisms in Cross-Jurisdictional Custody Disputes. Digital Law Journal, 3(2), 101–118.
Ginting, F., & Nasution, A. (2025). Cultural Approaches to Child Protection and Dispute Resolution in North Sumatra Family Courts. Journal of Indonesian Adat Law, 11(2), 88–104.
Gunawan, I., & Permata, S. (2024). Assessing the Socio-Economic Cost-Benefit of Mandatory Therapeutic Mediation in Indonesian Family Courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(1), 60–78.
Haryanto, E., & Kusuma, A. (2024). Litigation Fatigue: The Unseen Toll of Adversarial Divorce Proceedings on Children’s Welfare. Journal of Child Psychology and Law, 9(1), 33–49.
Indrawati, S., & Hakim, L. (2025). The Enforceability of Declaratory Judgments in Child Custody: Analyzing the Legal Vacuum and the Need for Executorial Peace Deeds. National Law Journal, 14(2), 150–165.
Jaya, S., & Putri, A. (2026). The Transformation of Family Dispute Resolution Post-PERMA No. 1 of 2016: Successes and Structural Failures. Judicial Quarterly, 10(3), 220–238.
Kurniawan, D., & Sari, I. (2024). Mediator Competence and the Illusion of Neutrality in Family Courts: When Judges Become Mediators. Indonesian Review of Legal Studies, 6(1), 77–92.
Lestari, P., & Widodo, J. (2025). Implementing the Therapeutic Model in Islamic Family Mediation: A Case Study of Post-Divorce Harmony. Sharia Law Journal, 13(4), 405–420.
Mahendra, G., & Surya, D. (2026). Caucus Mechanisms in Mediation: The Delicate Balance Between Confidentiality, Psychological Safety and Judicial Transparency. Journal of Procedural Law, 18(1), 55–71.
Pratama, R., & Wijaya, K. (2025). Compromise versus Welfare: The Ethical Dilemma of Child Allocation in Modern Divorce Settlements. Sociology of Law Journal, 9(3), 250–265.
Rizky, F., & Ananda, P. (2026). The Economic Implications of Prolonged Custody Battles on Single Mothers in Indonesia: Why Speedy Mediation Matters. Gender and Economy Review, 4(1), 15–30.
Saputra, B., & Setiawan, I. (2024). The Best Interests of the Child Principle in Supreme Court Jurisprudence: From Theory to Binding Precedent. Supreme Court Digest, 21(2), 180–198.
Tarihoran, T., & Siregar, T. (2025). Shifting Paradigms: From Distributive to Integrative Justice in Resolving Family Disputes in Indonesia. Philosophy of Law Journal, 12(4), 300–315.
Utami, R., & Wibowo, A. (2026). The Legal Standing and Executorial Power of Peace Agreements (Akta Perdamaian) in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law. Civil Law Review, 16(1), 40–58.
Widyastuti, N., & Yuliana, M. (2024). Conflict of Interest: The Ethical and Procedural Dilemma When Judges Mediate Their Own Cases. Ethics in Judiciary Journal, 8(2), 134–150.
Yusuf, M., & Zainuddin, A. (2025). International Perspectives on Child Custody Mediation: Lessons and Adaptations for the Indonesian Legal System. Global Family Law Journal, 5(3), 210–225.
Zulkarnain, Z., & Hakim, R. (2026). The Future of Non-Litigation Pathways in the Indonesian Judicial System: Towards a Restorative Approach in Family Law. Law and Development Review, 19(2), 165–182.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jgsims.v7i2.29856
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Hikmatiar Harahap, Bagus Ramadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Jl. Williem Iskandar, Pasar V Medan, Medan Estate 20371
» Tel / fax : (061) 6615 683 /
