Evaluation of the IMTAQ Religious Development Program Using SEM Approach in Asahan Regency

Salim Salim; Indra Jaya

doi:10.58836/jpma.v15i2.23152

Evaluation of the IMTAQ Religious Development Program Using SEM Approach in Asahan Regency

Salim Salim, Indra Jaya

Abstract

The IMTAQ program, implemented by the Asahan Regency Government since 2011, aims to shape community character based on religious values. This study evaluates its effectiveness by analyzing input variables (socialization, training, funding, information media, technical guidelines, human resources, facilities, and implementing organizations), process variables (fund allocation, monitoring, administration, financial management, workshops), and output variables (internalization of IMTAQ values, preservation of Islamic cultural arts, Quranic development). Involving 552 participants from various community sectors, the findings highlight that information media, financial administration, and facilities are key success factors, with Quranic development and cultural preservation as main indicators. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the evaluation revealed an 11% annual improvement in implementation. The results provide guidance for optimizing the program’s Management Information System (MIS), including human resources, technology, data, and communication networks.

Keywords

Program Evaluation, IMTAQ, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Asahan Regency

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abu Bakar, N., Uzaki, K., Mohamed Naim, A., & Abd Manaf, N. A. (2020). Intention to Implement 5S Management Among Students in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1992.03.04.281

Campbell, R. F., Bridges, E. M., & Nystrand, R. O. (1977). Introduction to educational administration. (No Title).

Cempellin, L., & Tofte, E. (2024). A close look into students’ perception of teamwork in a humanities course: integrating Brookfield’s Critical Incident Questionnaire and a revised Tuckman’s small group development model. Educational Research and Evaluation, 29(7–8), 518–537.

Dwijowijoto, R. N. (2003). Kebijakan publik: formulasi, implementasi, dan evaluasi. (No Title).

Faisal, S., & Naushad, M. (2021). The empirical evidence on Negating turnover intentions among academicians. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 270–282. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.22

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentivce-Hall International. Inc.

Handayani, N. F., & Huda, N. (2020). Manajemen pembiayaan pendidikan di SMA Negeri pascadesentralisasi pendidikan. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(4), 332–341.

Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ZQk0tAEACAAJ

Hough, J. R. (1984). Educational policy: an international survey. (No Title).

Irawan, M. D., Seraya, A., Amalia, N., & Arifianda, R. R. (2020). Penerapan Cobit 5 dalam Evaluasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi (Studi Kasus: Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Provinsi Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi Dan Aplikasi, 3(4).

Koontz, H. (1976). Management: A Systems and Contingency Analysis of Managerial Functions. McgGraw-Hill Book.

Newton, C., & Tarrant, T. (2012). Managing change in schools: A practical handbook. Routledge.

Nurholis, D., Khodijah, N., & Suryana, E. (2022). Analisis Kebijakan Kurikulum 2013. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 9(1), 98–114.

Ode, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 5(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002

Paramarta, W. A., Supartha, I. W. G., Dewi, I. G. A. M., & Surya, I. B. K. (2023). Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analysis for Validating the Academic Leadership Questionnaire for Indonesia’s Private Higher Education. Migration Letters, 20(6), 232–241.

Piet, A. S. (1994). Profil Pendidik Profesional. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Plunkett, D., & Sundell, T. (2023). Varieties of metalinguistic negotiation. Topoi, 42(4), 983–999.

Putt, A. D., & Springer, J. F. (1989). Policy research: Concepts, methods, and applications. (No Title).

Rifki, M. I., Darta, A., Halim Lubis, A., Siddik Hasibuan, M., Halim Hasugian, A., & Ramadhan, Y. (2022). Pelatihan Pengenalan Aplikasi Berbasis Web Tinkercad Sebagai Media Simulasi Mikrokontroler Pada Smk Taruna Tekno Nusantara. 28(3), 1–8. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpkm/article/download/37227/pdf

Sagala, S. (2009). Administrasi pendidikan kontemporer.

Sikula, A. F. (1976). Personnel administration and human resources management. (No Title).

Soetjipto, R. K. (2009). Profesi keguruan. In Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Steers, R. M. (1975). Problems in the measurement of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 546–558.

Tangkilisan, H. N. S. (2003). Analisis Kebijakan dan Manajemen Otonomi Daerah Kontemporer. (No Title).

Widodo, J. (2021). Analisis kebijakan publik: Konsep dan aplikasi analisis proses kebijakan publik. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Zarkasi, Z., Lustono, L., Zhafira, N. H., Laily, N., Febrian, W. D., Triono, F., … Irawan, I. (2023). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (The Art of Human Resource, Human Capital, and Human Relation).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58836/jpma.v15i2.23152