Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Preservasi Pengetahuan Di Indonesia

Euis Sri Nurhayati, Tamara Adriani Salim

Abstract


This research examines the development of research trends regarding knowledge preservation in Indonesia. The research aims to determine: (1) the development of the number of international publications regarding knowledge preservation in Indonesia in the Scopus database in 2012–2022, (2) the core journal, (3) the contribution of research institutions, (4) researcher productivity, (5) a development map based on subjects or fields, (6) keywords (co-words), and (7) authors (co-authors). Data collection was carried out using the keywords "preservation", "knowledge", and "Indonesia" in "categories, article titles, abstracts, and keywords" in the 2012–2022 time period. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and VosViewer. The research results showed that 467 articles were published in 2012–2022. There are 91 articles (19.49%) published in 2022, and this is the largest number of publications. IOP Conference Series Earth & Environmental Science is a core journal that publishes 39 publications (8.35%). The University of Indonesia is the most contributing institution, and Iskandar, J., is the most prolific writer, publishing six publications (1.28%). Social sciences are the subject or field with the most publications (34.68%). Based on keyword mapping (co-words), there are 9 groups, while based on authors (co-authors), there are 4 clusters. There is also a development trend that is increasing every year.


Keywords


bibliometrics, knowledge preservation, indonesia, vosviewer, scopus.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2008). Scopus™: The product and its development. The Serials Librarian, 49(3), 147-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v49n03_12

Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: a review. Biomedical digital libraries, 3(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1

Chen, X., et., al. (2016). Mapping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia computer science, 91, 547-555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.140

Cobo et al., (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (1) (2011), pp. 146-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Donthu, N., et., al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Farida, N. & Firmansyah, A., H. (2020). Analisis bibliometrik berdasarkan pendekatan Co-word: Kecenderungan penelitian bidang kearsipan pada Jurnal Khazanah dan Journal of Archive and Record tahun 2016–2019. Khazanah: Jurnal Pengembangan Kearsipan, 13(2), 91-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/khazanah.55690

Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4

Harimurti, W. R., & Emdrawati, S. (2019). Ada Apa dengan Konservasi, Preservasi, dan Restorasi? [Online] Diakses pada: https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/bpcbyogyakarta/ada-apa-dengan-konservasi-preservasi-dan-restorasi-seri-konservasi-bagian-1/

Makmur, T., Suadi, D., & Samsudin, D. (2021). Kajian Preservasi di Indonesia. UNILIB: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 12 (1), 54 - 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/unilib.vol12.iss1.art6

Moral-Muñoz, José A., et., al. (2020). “Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review”. El profesional de la información, v. 29, n. 1, e290103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03

Nawangsari, A. T., Junjunan, M. I., & Mulyono, R. D. A. P. (2020). Sustainability Reporting: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik pada Database Scopus. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 5(2), 137-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v5i2.2182

Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 5, 9-24. [Online] Diakses pada: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-25636

Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012

Rahayu, E. S. R., & Rusmiyati, E. (2018). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bidang Ilmu Instrumentasi. Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 39(2), 135-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.413

Sulardja, E. C. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik publikasi ilmiah bidang digital asset management berbasis data Scopus 2011-2020. Informatio: Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(3), 259-280. DOI : https://doi.org/10.24198/inf.v1i3.35339

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2011). Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.2058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1109.2058

Zagzebski, L. (2017). What is knowledge?. The Blackwell guide to epistemology, 92-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164863.biblio




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/iqra.v17i2.17366

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2023 Euis Sri Nurhayati, Tamara Adriani Salim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________
Alamat:

IQRA': JURNAL ILMU PERPUSTAKAAN DAN INFORMASI
Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Jalan Willem Iskandar Pasar V Medan Estate
20371
Medan - Sumatera Utara
Indonesia