MAPPING POLITICAL IDEOLOGY IN SOCIAL MEDIA NARRATIVES: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF X (TWITTER) POSTS ON PRESIDENT PRABOWO USING VAN DIJK’S MODEL
Abstract
This study examines how political ideology and leadership are constructed and contested in X (formerly Twitter) posts about President Prabowo’s international activities using Teun A. van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis model. Drawing on a qualitative corpus of posts from the president’s official account, news media, and citizen commentators, the research analyses macro structures (dominant themes), superstructures (narrative and evaluative schemas), and micro structures (lexical, stylistic, and visual features) related to foreign visits. Purposive sampling and close textual analysis reveal three macro themes: heroic diplomacy and strategic partnership, which dominate official and media posts, and contested leadership, which is prominent in citizen commentary. The findings show that institutional discourses normalise an image of energetic, globally engaged leadership, whereas citizen posts use irony, colloquial language, and satire to reframe the same events as objects of critique, questioning priorities, competence, and the link between international visibility and domestic legitimacy. The study concludes that X functions as a hybrid arena where political legitimacy is co‑constructed by institutional actors and ordinary users in Indonesia’s digital public sphere.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006 citedrive.com
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 63–85). SAGE Publications.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hermawan, A. (2022). Critical discourse analysis of online news on the Omnibus Law in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Society, 10(1), 45–60.
Kholidah, S. (2023). Van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis of anti-corruption discourse in Indonesian online media. Indonesian Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 5(2), 101–118.
Purwanti, D. (2025). Popular culture and ideology: A critical discourse analysis of viral digital content in Indonesia. Contemporary Humanities Journal, 7(1), 55–72.
Sujatmiko, B. (2020). Political discourse on social media: A critical discourse analysis of Twitter debates in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(3), 412–430.
Winingsih, R. (2022). Media framing of political institutions: A critical discourse analysis of Indonesian news coverage. Litera, 21(1), 77–92.
Zaimar, H. (2024). Ideological positioning in Indonesian song lyrics: A critical discourse analysis using van Dijk’s model. Studies in Language and Culture, 12(2), 89–105.
boyd, d. m., & Ellison, n. b. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x OUCI
Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decision making and internet research (Version 2.0). Association of Internet Researchers.
Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/inspiration.v4i2.27850
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:


