Limited Imprisonment: A Concept of Combining Imprisonment and Probation
Abstract
This research aims to explore and analyze the idea of limited imprisonment as a combination of imprisonment and supervision. The main focus of the research is to understand the purpose, methodology, and findings related to this innovative concept in the context of criminal justice. The main objective of the research is to identify the potential benefits and challenges of implementing limited imprisonment in the criminal justice system. The research methodology involved a combinative approach of legal literature analysis, case studies, and interviews with legal experts and criminal law practitioners. This examination of ideas was conducted by analyzing the legal aspects, social impacts, and practical feasibility of sanctioning violations of the law. The research findings suggest that limited imprisonment has the potential to provide a more humane and effective alternative in dealing with minor or non-violent offenses. Advantages include flexibility in sentencing, reduced prison burden, and providing greater rehabilitation opportunities for offenders. However, challenges such as the risk of abuse, legal uncertainty, and the need for clear regulation were also identified. This research contributes to the development of thinking in the field of criminal law, proposing an in-depth consideration of the implementation of limited imprisonment. Implications include the need for further study and further discussion in order to develop a framework that can answer legal, ethical, and policy questions related to the implementation of this idea in the criminal justice system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adabi, Muhammad Ikhwan, Adam Sani, Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar, and Rahmat Jhowanda. “Analisis Penerapan Tindak Pidana Persiapan Dalam Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 2 (2023): 46–55.
Hikmawati, Puteri. “Pidana Pengawasan Sebagai Pengganti Pidana Bersyarat Menuju Keadilan Restoratif (Criminal Conditional Supervision As a Substitute of Probation Sentence Towards Restorative Justice).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 7, no. 1 (2017): 71–88.
Igom, Silfester. “Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Rangka Penetapan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Dalam Perkara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 3, no. 1 (2014).
Irawati, Arista Candra. “Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp Asas Legalitas).” ADIL Indonesia Journal 1, no. 2 (2019).
Kholiq, Abdul, Barda Nawawi Arief, and Eko Soponyono. “Pidana Penjara Terbatas: Sebuah Gagasan Dan Reorientasi Terhadap Kebijakan Formulasi Jenis Sanksi Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Law Reform 11, no. 1 (2015): 100–112.
Kokong, Andrew Stevano. “Pidana Penjara Seumur Hidup Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan.” Lex Crimen 1, no. 2 (2012).
Mawaddah, Nur. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas Bank Syariah.” Jurnal Etikonomi 14, no. 2 (2015).
PERMATASARI, DITA AMELLIA. “DASAR PERTIMBANGAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PIDANA BERSYARAT.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2014, 1–15.
Saraswati, Putu Sekarwangi. “Kebijakan Formulasi Pengaturan Pidana Penjara Terbatas Dalam Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Perspektif Ius Constituendum.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) 2, no. 1 (2020).
Sumarlin, Enny. “Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Bersyarat.” Asy-Syari’ah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2023): 199–219.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v3i2.19690
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Emi Zuliah, Fadia Zahrani Zahrani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.