Gerakan PeKa Ramah Lingkungan: Literasi Inklusif dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan Difabel Melalui Pembalut Kain Berbasis Komunitas
Abstract
Gerakan PeKa (Pembalut Kain Ramah Lingkungan) merupakan inovasi sosial-lingkungan berbasis komunitas yang secara simultan menjawab tiga persoalan mendesak: krisis sampah pembalut sekali pakai, kesenjangan aksesibilitas produk menstruasi bagi perempuan difabel, dan rendahnya literasi lingkungan di masyarakat. Penelitian pengabdian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas Gerakan PeKa dalam memberdayakan komunitas difabel melalui pendekatan literasi inklusif. Metode yang digunakan adalah Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) dengan pelibatan aktif komunitas penyandang difabel (P3Y Yogyakarta), pesantren, dan lembaga pendidikan tinggi. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa program ini berhasil menjangkau lebih dari 1.300 peserta workshop, melatih komunitas paraplegia menjadi produsen utama PeKa, dan mendorong kemandirian ekonomi perempuan difabel. Pembalut kain terbukti lebih aksesibel bagi difabel fisik karena penggunaan kancing cetet menggantikan perekat konvensional. Gerakan PeKa membuktikan bahwa model sosial disabilitas dapat diintegrasikan dalam program pemberdayaan lingkungan berbasis nilai Islam.
Kata kunci: pembalut kain; difabel berdaya; literasi lingkungan; model sosial disabilitas; pemberdayaan perempuan
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Indonesian)References
Abou-Bakr, O. (2015). Islamic perspectives on environment and ecology. In S. C. Rockefeller (Ed.), Ecology and Religion: A Critical Anthology (pp. 112–128). Columbia University Press.
Aminah, S. (2018). PeKa Ramah Lingkungan: Inovasi pembalut kain berbasis komunitas di Yogyakarta. Laporan Riset dan Pendaftaran HAKI. UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. University of California Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dauvergne, P. (2018). Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans? Global Environmental Change, 51, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.002
Hobbs, C., Oioriza, M., & Guo, H. (2019). Material composition and environmental footprint of disposable menstrual hygiene products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104422
ILO. (2015). Disability inclusion in vocational skills development. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/skills/areas/WCMS_113249/lang--en/index.htm
IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896
Israel, B. A., Eng, E., Schulz, A. J., & Parker, E. A. (2019). Methods for community-based participatory research for health (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Kabeer, N. (2001). Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. In A. Sisask (Ed.), Discussing Women's Empowerment — Theory and Practice (pp. 17–54). SIDA Studies.
Krasny, M. E., & Tidball, K. G. (2015). Civic ecology: Adaptation and transformation from the ground up. MIT Press.
Lim, X. Z., Tan, D. Y., Seow, T. W., & Chua, K. H. (2021). A review on single-use menstrual products: Environmental impacts and sustainable alternatives. Sustainability, 13(9), 4973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094973
Mangunjaya, F. M. (2011). Developing environmental awareness and conservation through Islamic teaching. Journal of Islamic Studies, 22(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etq067
Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.024
Nasr, S. H. (1990). Islam and the environmental crisis. In S. C. Rockefeller & J. C. Elder (Eds.), Spirit and Nature: Why the Environment is a Religious Issue (pp. 85–108). Beacon Press.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement: A sociological approach. Macmillan Education.
Putri, A. K., Damayanti, R., & Wahyuni, E. T. (2020). Pengelolaan limbah padat di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang menuju circular economy. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Berkelanjutan, 4(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.36813/jplb.4.2.115-128
Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. ERIC/SMEAC Environmental Education Digest.
Setyaningtyas, A. (2018). Kajian dampak lingkungan pembalut wanita sekali pakai: Studi kasus di Yogyakarta. Prosiding Konferensi APRSCP ke-10. Asia-Pacific Roundtable for Sustainable Consumption and Production.
Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons.
UN CRPD. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/crpd/pages/conventionrightspersonswithdisabilities.aspx
WHO. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization & World Bank. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068780
WHO. (2018). Priority assistive products list: Improving access to assistive technology. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/priority-assistive-products-list
WHO. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization.
Azra, A. (2004). The origins of Islamic reformism in Southeast Asia: Networks of Malay-Indonesian and Middle Eastern ‘Ulama’ in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. University of Hawaii Press.
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.915826
Berghs, M., Atkin, K., Graham, H., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016). Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: A scoping study and evidence synthesis. Public Health Research, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.3310/phr04080
Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production: How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. NESTA.
Bruinessen, M. van. (2011). Kitab kuning, pesantren dan tarekat (3rd ed.). Gading Publishing.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). “Mode 3” and the “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Devlieger, P., Rusch, F., & Pfeiffer, D. (Eds.). (2006). Rethinking disability: The emergence of new definitions, concepts, and communities. Garant.
Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (Eds.). (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. Oxford University Press.
Disabled Peoples International. (2011). DPI position statement on independent living. Disabled Peoples International. https://www.dpi.org
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition (Vol. 1). Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (2002). The global challenge of sustainability. In D. Tilbury, R. B. Stevenson, J. Fien, & D. Schreuder (Eds.), Education and sustainability: Responding to the global challenge (pp. 1–12). IUCN.
Foltz, R. C. (Ed.). (2003). Environmentalism in the Muslim world. Nova Science Publishers.
Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (Eds.). (2015). Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42488-0
Handicap International. (2009). Disability-inclusive development toolkit. Handicap International. https://www.handicap-international.us
Hennegan, J., Shannon, A. K., Rubli, J., Schwab, K. J., & Melendez-Torres, G. J. (2019). Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. PLOS Medicine, 16(5), e1002803. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002803
Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2022). Data penyandang disabilitas Indonesia 2022. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kesejahteraan Sosial, Kemensos RI. https://www.kemsos.go.id
Kett, M., & Cole, E. (2011). Disability and livelihoods in post-conflict environments. Development in Practice, 21(3), 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2011.558063
Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.). (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press.
Puspitawati, N., & Suganda, H. (2019). Peran mahasiswa KKN dalam sosialisasi lingkungan hidup di masyarakat pedesaan Jawa. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.39816
Rastogi, N., Srivastava, S., & Singh, P. (2022). Reusable menstrual products as sustainable solution: A systematic review of adoption barriers and enablers in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health, 22, 1871. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14271-4
Sanchez-Ramirez, C., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Bernal-Garcia, A. (2020). Life cycle assessment of reusable menstrual products compared to disposable alternatives. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(7), 1374–1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01764-2
Sommer, M., Chandraratna, S., Cavill, S., Mahon, T., & Phillips-Howard, P. (2015). Managing menstruation in the workplace: An overlooked issue in low- and middle-income countries. Global Health: Science and Practice, 3(4), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00238
Stapleton, D. C., O’Day, B. L., Livermore, G. A., & Imparato, A. J. (2006). Dismantling the poverty trap: Disability policy for the twenty-first century. The Milbank Quarterly, 84(4), 701–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2006.00465.x
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations General Assembly. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2021). Single-use plastic: A roadmap for sustainability. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/single-use-plastics-roadmap-sustainability
Wibowo, A. T., Herdiansyah, H., & Trisasongko, B. H. (2020). Efektivitas pendidikan lingkungan berbasis kearifan lokal terhadap perubahan perilaku masyarakat di DAS Ciliwung. Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan, 10(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.10.2.195-209
Wilson, J., & Swain, M. (2021). Economic and environmental case for reusable menstrual products in low-income settings: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet Global Health, 9(Suppl. 1), S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00013-7
Yeo, R., & Moore, K. (2003). Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: “Nothing about us, without us.” World Development, 31(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00218-8
Yunus, M. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. PublicAffairs.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.37064/jpm.v14i1.29755
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Siti Aminah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.