CONTEXTUAL REPRESENTATION IN INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Hendro Yrianto, Ike Iswary Lawanda, Tamara Adriani Salim

Abstract


This study systematically examines how the context of records creation is represented in the literature on records management in Indonesian government agencies, with particular attention to organizational activities. This inquiry is important because the activity context underlying records creation helps explain the meaning of records, inter-record relationships, and their appropriate use. A weak representation of this context may contribute to disorder in records management and weaken the evidential function of records as traces of organizational activity. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on PRISMA 2020, this study searched Google Scholar and GARUDA for journal articles published between 2014 and 2025. Following identification, screening, and eligibility assessment, 94 articles were selected. The data were analyzed through thematic synthesis, involving initial coding, descriptive theme development, and analytical theme formulation. The findings indicate that the context of records creation has not been widely discussed as an independent theoretical concept. Instead, it tends to appear implicitly through records management practices, instruments, and systems. Three discussion patterns were identified: implicit-procedural, instrumental-operational, and explicit-conceptual. The context of organizational activities is represented through organizational functions and work processes, records creators and managing units, administrative workflows, classification and filing, description and metadata, retention, and accountability. This study suggests that strengthening context representation is necessary so that government records are understood not merely as administrative documents, but also as evidence of organizational activities, sources of contextual information, and institutional memory. However, as this study is literature-based, it does not directly assess contextual representation practices in specific government agencies.


Keywords


records management; archival context; context representation; government records; systematic literature review; thematic synthesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aulianto, D. R. (2022). Evaluasi pengelolaan arsip dinamis pada unit pengolah di Sekretariat Utama Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. Lentera Pustaka: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 8(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.14710/lenpust.v8i1.44715

Avidiansyah, Z. (2025). Reflection on research trends with the theme of archives management in the range of 3 decades (1994–2024): A bibliometric analysis. Record and Library Journal, 11(2), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V11-I2.2025.457-479

Azhari, A., Wolor, C. W., & Marsofiyati. (2023). Analisis pengelolaan arsip inaktif pada LKPP. Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Umum, 1(6), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.47861/jkpu-nalanda.v1i6.661

Basya, M. R., & Puspasari, D. (2021). Analisis pengelolaan arsip di Kantor Kecamatan Bungah Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), 439–453. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpap

Bramer, W. M., Giustini, D., & Kramer, B. M. R. (2016). Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE and Google Scholar: A prospective study. Systematic Reviews, 5, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7

Duranti, L., Eastwood, T., & MacNeil, H. (2002). Preservation of the integrity of electronic records. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9892-7

Ghofilah, P. N. N., Sukaesih, Kusnandar, & Romaddyniah, L. (2022). Pengelolaan arsip di Dinas Arsip dan Perpustakaan Kabupaten Cianjur. Al-Kuttab: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan, Informasi dan Kearsipan, 4(2), 55–69.

Jannana, N. S., & Fadhilah, R. S. N. (2018). Manajemen arsip sebagai bagian hidup organisasi: Studi kasus di Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kota Magelang. Manageria: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 335–351.

Ketelaar, E. (2023). Archival contexts. Archeion, CXXIV, 35–56. https://doi.org/10.4467/26581264ARC.23.003.17863

Listiyani, M., & Alamsyah. (2019). Analisis autentikasi dan pengelolaan arsip elektronik di Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kabupaten Semarang. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(3), 1–9.

Maharani, V. D. D., & Lawanda, I. I. (2023). Implementasi electronic document management system untuk mendukung e-government: Studi kasus Sistem Naskah Dinas Elektronik (SINDE) Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. Multikultura, 2(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.7454/multikultura.v2i1.1132

Mariyamah, A., Syarif, V. D. P., & Hendarwati, W. P. (2024). Mapping research trends on archives: A bibliometric study. Open Society Conference, 2, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.33830/osc.v2i1.2605

Nurrachmaningrum, A. P., & Lestari, Y. (2023). Pengelolaan sistem kearsipan elektronik “SIMANSU” di Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Provinsi Jawa Timur. Inovant, 1(3), 536–548.

Pacheco, A., Guardado Da Silva, C., & Vieira De Freitas, M. C. (2023). A metadata model for authenticity in digital archival descriptions. Archival Science, 23, 629–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-023-09422-w

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 152.

Roe, K. D. (2005). Arranging and describing archives and manuscripts. Society of American Archivists.

Sukarman, S., Harianto, H., & Amalia, N. (2026). Pemetaan tren riset arsip digital: Studi bibliometrik menggunakan database Dimensions (2020–2024). Inkunabula: Journal of Library Science and Islamic Information, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24239/inkunabula.v5i1.4339

Tahra, T., & Lestari, Y. (2024). Analisis pengelolaan arsip dinamis di Sub Bagian Administrasi Kewilayahan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Inovasi Administrasi Negara Terapan, 2(3). https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/innovant/article/view/33652

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Walters, W. H. (2009). Google Scholar search performance: Comparative recall and precision. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0034

Williams, C. (2006). Managing archives: Foundations, principles and practice. Chandos Publishing.

Yakel, E. (2003). Archival representation. Archival Science, 3(1), 1–25.

Yeo, G. (2007). Concepts of record (1): Evidence, information, and persistent representations. The American Archivist, 70(2), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q

Yunda, N. R., Sukaesih, & Prahatmaja, N. (2022). Pengelolaan arsip dinamis dalam menunjang tertib administrasi di Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kota Bandung. Nautical: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(9), 638–648. https://jurnal.arkainstitute.co.id/index.php/nautical/index

Zhang, J. (2012). Archival representation in the digital age. Journal of Archival Organization, 10(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2012.677671




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v11i2.30165

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2026 Hendro Yrianto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
 
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/jipi/
 
Publisher:
Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara