Integration of the Authorities of APIP and BPK in Calculating State Financial Losses

Murad Fadirah, Moh Fadli, Shinta Hadiyantina

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the differences in the positions and sources of authority of the APIP and the BPK in calculating state losses against the evidentiary value of audit results in corruption cases, as well as to analyze the integration model of the APIP and BPK authorities to avoid potential differences in audit results in determining the amount of state financial losses. The research method used is normative juridical legal research. The approaches used are the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. The results of this study indicate that the positions and sources of authority of the APIP and the BPK have implications for the evidentiary strength of audit results in corruption cases. The integration of authority between the APIP and the BPK can be done through a single gate authority mechanism that positions the BPK as the supreme audit institution that must be coordinated by law enforcement officials to avoid differences in audit results in calculating state losses.


Keywords


Authority; APIP; BPK; State Financial Losses

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Latif, Maftuh Effendi, & Muhammad Dzul Ikram. (2021). Penetapan Kerugian Keuangan Negara atas Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Alfian Syahawaluna, & Moh. Syahrul Nur Arsyfi. (2023). Metode dan Faktor Penghitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada BPKP Jakarta. Transformasi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 7(2), 2–22.

Bagir Manan. (2004). Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Baritim Parjuangan Sinaga. (n.d.). Filsafat Hukum Mengajarkan Kepastian Hukum.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Indana Zulfa. (2023). Perbedaan Pengitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara (Studi pada Kasus Korupsi Bakamla No. 35/PIDSUS-TPK/2020/PN.JKT.PSTS) (Tesis). Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Indroharto. (2002). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions. The Lima Declaration. , INTOSAI-P 1 § (1998).

Laporan Hasil Audit Penghitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Nomor: PE.03.03/SR/LHP-741/PW23/5/2022 tanggal 30 Desember 2022. (2022). NusaTenggara Barat.

Limbong, T. E., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Pencegahan Kecurangan: Audit Internal, Kesadaran Anti Fraud, Independensi Auditor Internal. Jurnal Economina, 2(6), 1451–1461. https://doi.org/10.55681/economina.v2i6.631

Moh. Fadli. (2011). Peraturan Delegasi di Indonesia (Cetakan Pertama). Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Moh. Fadli, & Sofyan Hadi. (2023). Kepastian Hukum: Perspektif Teoritik. Malang: PT. Nuswantara Media Utama.

Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara. BPK RI § (2017). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/31506/peraturan-bpk-no-1-tahun-2017.

Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. BPK RI § (2008). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/4876/pp-no-60-tahun-2008.

Philipus M. Hadjon. (1997). Tentang Kewenangan. Yuridika, 7(5–6).

Pranomo, S., Istislam, I., & Hadiyantina, S. (2025). Synergy and Accountability of Financial Supervision in Governance. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 6(1), 540–548. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1042

Priyatno, A. A. (2025). Pencegahan Kerugian Negara Melalui Penguatan Regulasi Hubungan Kerja Pemeriksa Eksternal Dengan Pengawas Internal. SHARE Journal, 1(2), 251–280. https://doi.org/10.28986/jshare.v1i2.2435

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25//PUU-XIV/2016 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999. , Pub. L. No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016, MKRI (2016). https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/25_PUU-XIV_2016.pdf.

Putusan Nomor24/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN. (2024).

Rahmawati Sururama, & Rizki Amalia. (2020). Pengawasan Pemerintahan. Bandung: Cendekia Press.

Ridwan HR. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Saldi Isra. (2020). Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, Wewenang dan Dinamika Konstitusional. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Sri Nurhari Susanto. (2020). Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan. Administrative Law & Governance, 3(3), 430–440.

Suhendar. (2015). Konsep Kerugian Keuangan Negara: Pendekatan Hukum Pidana, Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Pidana Khusus Korupsi. Malang: Setara Press.

Sumarto, S., & Rahadian, Y. (2020). Evaluasi Penerapan Metode Penghitungan Kerugian Negara Dalam Membantu Penanganan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 12(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v12i1.23866

Tesa, S. (2025). The Authority of the Financial Audit Agency and the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in Assessing Elements of State Losses. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(6), 875–882. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.6.875-882

Transparency International. (2025, March 15). “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi 2024: Korupsi, Demokrasi dan Krisis Lingkungan.”

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara. BPK RI § (2004). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40509/uu-no-15-tahun-2004.

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, Lembaran negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2006 Nomor 85. , BPK RI § (2006). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40184/uu-no-15-tahun-2006.

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pub. L. No. 31, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45350/uu-no-31-tahun-1999 (1999).

W. Riawan Tjandra. (2019). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Cetakan Kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Widya Castrena Budi Dharma. (2023). Kewenangan Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah dalam Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Jurnal Idea Hukum, 9(2), 196–277.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v10i2.30317

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
Creative Commons License
International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies (IJLRES) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License . You are free to share and adapt the material under the terms of this license, provided appropriate credit is given, it is not used for commercial purposes, and any derivatives are shared under the same license.