Determining the Main Priority in the Assessment of Hollywood Horror Films by Applying the AHP and SAW Methods

Muhammad Siddik Hasibuan, Muhammad Dedi Irawan, Dian Agus Pratama, Yudhistira Yudhistira


Film is one of the many modern communication media that is very effective to be used as a medium of entertainment as well as a place to convey moral messages that can influence the audience both from the aspect of attitude, point of view of thought and also insight. For this reason, the production house is required to continue to create a film of the highest quality. Because the proliferation of these types of horror films makes it difficult for viewers to determine which Hollywood horror film is the best version, this is also one of our goals in designing a web-based system. In this case study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods are used to determine the best priority for each alternative assessment. The assessment procedure is based on predetermined criteria. The criteria used as assessment provisions are budget, film duration, audience rating, film rating, film awards and film revenues. The method used is to compare the AHP and SAW methods as well as the results of calculations from the system. The results of the discussion include the stages of assessment and comparison of each method used and are able to appoint the best alternative in the selection of Hollywood horror films.

Full Text:



M. D. Irawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Matakuliah Pilihan pada Kurikulum Berbasis KKNI Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Sugeno,” J. n.a Infotama, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.37676/jmi.v13i1.435.

S. M. Sumarno and J. M. Harahap, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN DALAM MENENTUKAN PEMILIHAN POSISI KEPALA UNIT (KANIT) PPA DENGAN METODE WEIGHT PRODUCT,” JUST IT: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2020.

J. Putri Lestari and D. Agushinta R, “Decision Support System to Majoring High School Student Using Simple Additive Weighting Method,” IJCTT, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 153–159, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V10P126.

C. A. Josaputri, E. Sugiharti, and R. Arifudin, “Decision Support Systems for The Determination of Cattle with Superior Seeds using AHP and SAW Method,” Scientific Journal of Informatics, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 2016.

F. Nugraha, B. Surarso, and B. Noranita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Pemilihan Pemenang Pengadaan Aset dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Sistem Info. Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 067–072, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.21456/vol2iss2pp067-072.

N. Aminudin et al., “Higher Education Selection using Simple Additive Weighting,” IJET, vol. 7, no. 2.27, p. 211, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i2.27.11731.

R. E. Sari, A. Meizar, D. H. Tanjung, and A. Y. Nugroho, “Decision making with AHP for selection of employee,” in 2017 5th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia, Aug. 2017, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2017.8089285.


A. Mukhlasin, “PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL SISFOTEK (Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi) Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphone Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Berbasis Web,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sisfotek, no. September, pp. 4–5, 2018.

F. Nugraha, B. Surarso, and B. Noranita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Pemilihan Pemenang Pengadaan Aset dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 67–72, 2012, doi: 10.21456/vol2iss2pp067-072.

Y. H. Siregar, M. D. Irawan, and A. H. A. Chaniago, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) dalam Perekrutan Petugas Keamanan,” Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 371–378, 2020.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.