Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope


Jurnal AL-HARAKAH: Jurnal Studi Islam adalah jurnal akademik peer-review, didirikan pada 2018 sebagai bagian dari Pemikiran Politik Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Islam UIN Sumatera Utara Medan. Jurnal AL-HARAKAH didedikasikan untuk publikasi artikel ilmiah di berbagai cabang Studi Islam, di mana pertukaran ide sebagai temuan penelitian difasilitasi. Jurnal AL-HARAKAH menyambut baik kontribusi artikel bidang-bidang seperti Studi Al-Quran, Tradisi Nabi, Politik, Sosiologi, Teologi, Filsafat, Hukum dan Ekonomi, Sejarah, Pendidikan Islam, dll.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Proses review pada jurnal Al-Harakah menggunakan double blind peer review dimana baik pengarang maupun reviewer tidak akan mengetahui satu sama lain pemilik artikel dan reviewer artikel.



Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

  1. Jurnal AL-HARAKAH adheres to the prevailing research standards and procedures for investigating publication ethics.
  2. Jurnal AL-HARAKAH does not allow dual publication (the same material published twice in the peer reviewed literature), or dual submission (the same material simultaneously submitted to more than one journal).
  3. Specifically, Jurnal AL-HARAKAH does not tolerate plagiarism, data or figure manipulation, knowingly providing incorrect information, copyright infringement, inaccurate author attributions, attempts to inappropriately manipulate the peer review process, failures to declare conflicts of interest, fraud, and libel. This list is not exhaustive - if there is uncertainty of what constitutes such actions, then more resources may be found at the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Council of Science Editors (CSE), or the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).
  4. Jurnal AL-HARAKAH will rigorously enforce our standards, and follow up on any transgressions. In extreme cases, this may call for individuals to be reported to their institutions and/or for manuscripts to be retracted.
  5. The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.