Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Struktur Modal Sebagai Variabel Moderasi

Irma Yuliani

Abstract


Mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan yang baik kian mejadi salah satu perhatian penting dalam dunia perusahaan. Saat ini, untuk mengonfirmasi kesehatan perusahaan tidak cukup dengan melihat laporan dan proyeksi keuangan saja, tetapi juga perlu memperhatikan struktur dan mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan terhadap kinerja perusahaan dengan melibatkan struktur modal sebagai variabel moderasi. Adapun variabel tata kelola perusahaan yang digunakan diantaranya yaitu jumlah dewan komisaris, komisaris independen, jumlah direksi, dan komite audit. Sedangkan dalam mengukur kinerja digunakan variabel return on asset (ROA). Hasil dari penelitian ini menujukkan bahwa variabel tata kelola perusahaan dan interaksinya dengan variabel struktur modal secara simultan berpengaruh terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Namun secara parsial, hanya 2 hipotesis yang terbukti, yaitu pengujian pengaruh variabel struktur modal terhadap kinerja keuangan serta variabel struktur modal yang berinteraksi dengan variabel jumlah dewan komisaris terhadap kinerja keuangan.

 

Good corporate governance mechanisms are increasingly becoming an important concern in the corporate world. Currently, to confirm the health of the company is not enough to just look at financial reports and projections, it is also necessary to pay attention to the structure and mechanisms of corporate governance. This study aims to see the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on company performance by involving capital structure as a moderating variable. The corporate governance variables used include the number of commissioners, independent commissioners, number of directors, and audit committee. Meanwhile, in measuring performance, the variable return on assets (ROA) is used. The results of this study indicate that corporate governance variables and their interactions with capital structure variables simultaneously affect company performance. But partially, only 2 hypotheses have been proven, namely testing the effect of the capital structure variable on financial performance and the capital structure variable that interacts with the number of commissioners variable on financial performance..


Keywords


Tata kelola perusahaan, Struktur modal, Regresi data panel, Analisis regresi moderasi

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdallah, A. A.-N., & Ismail, A. K. (2017). Corporate governance practices, ownership structure, and corporate performance in the GCC countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 46, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2016.08.004

Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331397

Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52(4), 971–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x

Chang, Y.-K., Chou, R. K., & Huang, T.-H. (2014). Corporate governance and the dynamics of capital structure: New evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.026

Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all?$. Journal of Financial Economics, 28.

Connelly, J. T., Limpaphayom, P., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2012). Form versus substance: The effect of ownership structure and corporate governance on firm value in Thailand. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1722–1743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.017

Detthamrong, U., Chancharat, N., & Vithessonthi, C. (2017). Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.011

Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms_. Journal of Financial Economics, 20.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Eka, B. I., & Muid, D. (2017). Analisis pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan dan penghindaran pajak terhadap nilai perusahaan. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 6(3), 9.

Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2006). Corporate Governance Structure and Performance of Malaysian Listed Companies. Journal of Business Finance Accounting, 33(7–8), 1034–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00594.x

Harjito, A., & Martono. (2011). Manajemen keuangan. Yogyakarta: Ekonesia.

Imadudin, Z. (2014). Pengaruh struktur modal terhadap kinerja perusahaan. 16.

Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from India’s Top Companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jiraporn, P., Kim, J.-C., Kim, Y. S., & Kitsabunnarat, P. (2012). Capital structure and corporate governance quality: Evidence from the Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). International Review of Economics & Finance, 22(1), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2011.10.014

Kieschnick, R., & Moussawi, R. (2018). Firm age, corporate governance, and capital structure choices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.011

Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002

Muniandy, B., & Hillier, J. (2015). Board independence, investment opportunity set and performance of South African firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2014.11.003

Myers, S. C. (1984). Capital Structure puzzle. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, 35.

Riyanto, B. (2008). Dasar-dasar pembelanjaan perusahaan. Yogyakarta: GPFE.

Sivathaasan, N. (2016). Corporate governance and leverage in Australia: A pitch. 15(4), 7.

Sutedi, A. (2011). Good corporate governance. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Widyarini, & Wibowo, M. G. (2009). Manajemen syariah. Yogyakarta: Biruni Press.

Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Irma Yuliani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

TANSIQ: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Syariah merupakan terbitan ilmiah yang dikelola oleh Jurusan Manajemen Syariah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/tansiq/