.png){kind=logo}
Strategi Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi dalam Menerapkan Library 2.0
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the Engagement Rate academic library and to analyze strategies in implementing Library 2.0 as well as to identify barriers in applying Library 2.0. The approach in this research uses a qualitative with a comparative case study method. The Engagement Rate results University of Indonesia Library ranks first, Gadjah Mada University Library in the second and Airlangga University Library on the third. This study University of Indonesia Library and the Airlangga University Library where research was conducted, which resulted in research that both libraries have had strategies in the application of Library 2.0 which is parsed by forming components Library 2.0 is user participation, Web 2.0, perpustkaaan and services, evaluation and cooperation. Another finding is that both libraries have the same strategy, on the other hand there are also different strategies. When one component is weak then the other components further strengthened.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat keterlibatan (Engagement Rate) perpustakaan perguruan tinggi dan menganalisis strategi perpustakaan perguruan tinggi dalam menerapkan Library 2.0 serta untuk mengidentifikasi hambatan perpustakaan perguruan tinggi dalam menerapkan Library 2.0. Pendekatan dalam tesis ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus komparatif.Hasil perhitungan tingkat keterlibatan didapatkan Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia menempati urutan pertama, Perpustakaan Universitas Gadjah Mada pada urutan kedua serta Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga pada urutan ketiga. Penelitian ini memilih Perpustakaan UI dan Perpustakaan Unair menjadi lokasi penelitian, dimana menghasilkan penelitian bahwa kedua perpustakaan telah memiliki strategi dalam penerapan Library 2.0 yang diurai menurut komponen pembentuk Library 2.0 yaitu partisipasi pengguna, web 2.0, perpustkaaan dan layanan, evaluasi dan kerjasama. Temuan yang lain kedua perpustakaan memiliki strategi yang sama, di sisi lain ada juga strategi yang berbeda. Ketika salah satu komponen lemah maka komponen lain lebih diperkuat.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abram, S. (2005). Web 2.0 - huh?! library 2.0, librarian 2.0. Information Outlook, 9(12): 44-46.
Agosto, D. E., & Hughes-Hassell, S. (2010). Urban teens in the library: Research
and practice. Chicago: American Library Association.
ALA. (2012). The 2012 state of america’s libraries : a report from the American
library association. Maret 29, 2015.http://www.ala.org/news/sites/ala.org.news/files/content/StateofAmericasLibrariesReport2012Finalwithcover.pdf.
Albarran, A. B. (2013). The sosial media industries. New York: Routledge.
Anna, Nove E.V. (2015). Penggunaan web 2.0 sebagai media promosi perpustakaan
perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Record and Library Journal, 1(1), Januari-Juni 2015
Anderson, P. (2012). Web 2.0 and beyond: Principles and technologies. Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
Ashraf, T., Sharma, J., & Gulati, P. A. (2010).Developing sustainable digital
libraries: Socio-technical perspectives. Hershey PA: Information Science
Reference.
APJII.(2014). Statistik Internet Indonesia.Juli 13, 2015.
http://www.apjii.or.id/v2/read/article/Statistik/263/statistik-internet-indonesia-
.html.
Bradley, P. (2007).How to use Web 2.0 in your library.London:Facet Publishing.
Breeding, M. (2008). Content, community, and visibility: A winning combination.
Computers in Libraries, 28(4), 26-28.
Budd, J. (2005). The changing academic library: Operations, cultures, environments.
Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
Buono, M. P., & Kordeliski, A. (2013). Connect, create, collaborate how and why
social media is good for your library and why you should join the fun. Young
Adult Library Services, 11(2), 30-31,40.
Cassell, K. A., & Hiremath, U. (2013).Reference and information services: An
introduction. Chicago: American Library Association.Casey, M. E., & Savastinuk, L. C. (2007).Library 2.0: a guide to participatory
library service. Medford, N.J: Information Today.
Chinwe, N. E., & Igwesi, U. (2012). Utilizing social media for dynamic library
services delivery: The nigeria experience. International Research : Journal of
Library and Information Science, 2(2).
Choi, C. (2012). Is your library ready for a social media librarian?.Juni 23,2015.
http://conferences.alia.org.au/alia2012/Papers/18_Crystall.Choi.pdf
Cohen, L. B. (2007). Library 2.0 initiatives in academic libraries. Chicago:
Association of College and Research Libraries.
Connor, E. (2009).An introduction to staff development in academic libraries. New
York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five
approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed
methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Dewi, Lily Puspa and Suryani, Erma (2013).Pemodelan peningkatan kunjungan
pengguna perpustakaan dengan sistem dinamik.Jurnal SISFO. 4 (4) : 283-294
Donham, J. (2013). Enhancing teaching and learning: A leadership guide for school
librarians. Chicago : American Library Association.
Eden, B. L. (2015). Enhancing teaching and learning in the 21st-century academic
library: Successful innovations that make a difference. London : Rowman &
Littlefield
Edwards, J. B., Robinson, M. S., & Unger, K. R. (2013).Transforming libraries,
building communities: The community-centered library.Lanham, Maryland :The
Scarecrow Press
Esse, U. C. (2013). Library 2.0: Perception, knowledge and reception among
information professionals at covenant university library. Ife Psychologia. 21(2) :
-189.
Fajrina, HN. (2015). 700 juta pengguna dan 30 milyar pesan beredar di whatsapp.
Maret 29, 2015.http://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20150107103718-185-
/700-juta-pengguna-dan-30-miliar-pesan-beredar-di-whatsapp/.
Farkas, M. G. (2007). Sosial software in libraries: building collaboration,
communication, and community online. Medford, N.J: Information Today.
Freedman, L. (2013).Strategy: A history. New York : Oxford University Press.
Foo, Schubert & Judy NG. (2008, Mei) .Library 2.0, Libraries, and Library School.
Proceding Library Association of Singapore Conference 2008, Singapura.
Gupta, D. K., Savard, R., & International Federation of Library Associations and
Institutions. (2011). Marketing libraries in a Web 2.0 world. Berlin: De Gruyter
Saur.
Godwin, P., & Parker, J. (2008).Information literacy meets library 2.0. London:
Facet Publishing.
Gorman, G. E., Clayton, P., Shep, S. J., & Clayton, A. (2005).Qualitative research
for the information professional: A practical handbook. London: Facet Publishing.
Governor, J., Nickull, D., & Hinchcliffe, D. (2009).Web 2.0 Architectures.
Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
Grosch, A. N. (1995). Library information technology and networks. New York: M.
Dekker.
Habib, M.C (2006). Toward academic Library 20: development and application of a
Libary methodology. Master Tesis pada Master of Science in Library Science
Universitas North California Chapel Hill, North Carolina : tidak dipublikasikan.
Harinarayana, N. S., & Raju, N. V. (2010). Web 2.0 features in university library web
sites. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 69-88.
Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M., & Widén-Wulff, G. (2009). What is
library 2.0?.Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 668-681.
Johnson, Peggy. (2013). Fundamentals of collection development and management.
rd, rev. ed. Chicago: American Library Association.
Jordan, Mark (2003).The self‐education of systems librarians, Library Hi Tech, Vol.
Iss: 3, pp.273 – 279.
Kaiser, R. (2012). Library success with web 2.0 services: An introduction into the use
of web tools as blogs, wikis, podcast - a new generation of information services.
Berlin: Simon-Verl. für Bibliothekswissen.
Kelsey, S., & St, A. K. (2008).Handbook of research on computer mediated
communication. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods & techniques. New Delhi:
New Age International (P) Ltd.
Lipman, V. (2012).The World's Most Active Twitter City? You Won't Guess It. Juni
, 2015. http://www.forbes.com/sites/victorlipman/2012/12/30/the-worlds-most-
active-twitter-city-you-wont-guess-it/
Lukman,E.(2015).The latest numbers on web, mobile, and social media in Indonesia
(infographic).Juni 23,2015. https://www.techinasia.com/indonesia-web-
mobile-data-start-2015/
Lwoga, Edda Tandi.(2014). Integrating Web 2.0 into an academic library in
Tanzania, The Electronic Today,32(2),83-202.
Maness, J.M (2006). Library 2.0 theory : Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries.
Webology.3(2).Juli 1, 2015.http://webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html.
Marco, G. A. (2012). The American public library handbook. Santa Barbara,
California: Libraries Unlimited.
Mathews, B. (2009). Marketing today's academic library: A bold new approach to
communicating with students. Chicago: American Library Association.
Matthews, G., & Walton, G. (2012).University libraries and space in the digital
world. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.
McHale, N. (2013). Designing and developing library intranets. London: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miller, M. A. (2012). Indonesia: studentyouthmovementmakingmoreuseofsocial
media. Global Information Network.Juli 1, 2015.
http://search.proquest.com/docview/992882417?accountid=17242
Miller, W., & Pellen, R. M. (2005).Libraries beyond their institutions: Partnerships
that work. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.
Nickols, F. (2012).Strategy: Definitions and Meaning. Juli 13, 2015.
http://www.nickols.us/strategy_definition.htm
Nguyen, L. C., Partridge, H., & Edwards, S. L. (2012).Towards an understanding of
the participatory library.Library Hi Tech, 30(2), 335-346.
Noor, Muhammad Usman. (2014). Penggunaan twitter di perpustakaan akademik di
Indonesia : potensial namun tak dimanfaatkan. Seminar nasional informasi
sebagai aset bangsa.Depok, 20-21 Oktober 2014.
Pickard, A. J., & Childs, S. (2013). Research methods in information. Chicago: Neal-
Schuman.
Purcell, M. A. (2012). The networked library: A guide for the educational use of
sosial networking sites. Santa Barbara, California : Linworth
Poerwandari, E. Kristi.(2005). Pendekatan kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku
manusia.Depok : LPSP3
Republik Indonesia. 2007. Undang-Undang nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang
perpustakaan. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional.
Republik Indonesia. 2014. Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 24 tahun 2014 tentang
pelaksanaan undang-undang nomor 43 tahun 2007 tentang perpustakaan. Jakarta:
Perpustakaan Nasional.
Shoniwa, P., & Hall, H. (2007). Library 2.0 and UK academic libraries: drivers and
impacts. New Review of Information Networking, 13(2), 69-79
Snee, Helena. (2008). Sosial sciences collections and research web 2.0 as a sosial
science research tool. Februari 2, 2015.
http://www.bl.uk/reshelp/bldept/socsci/socint/web2/web2.pdf
Ofili, D. N., & Emwanta, M. (2014). Facebook as an information service delivery
tool: perspectives of library staff at the university of benin, nigeria. African
Journal Of Library, Archives & Information Science. 24(2): 195-202.
Oxford, R. L. (2010). Library 2.0 and information competency in california
community college distance education programs: A descriptive study. Disertasi
pada Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership pada Universitas Negeri
California, Fresno : tidak dipublikasikan
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003).Qualitative research practice: A guide for sosial
science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.
Runeson, P. (2012). Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and
examples. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
Reza, JI. (2015). Pengguna internet Indonesia kuasai media sosial di 2015.Maret 29,
http://portal.cbn.net.id/cbprtl/cybertech/detail.aspx?x=Tech+Info&y=cybertech|0|0|2|18233
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage
Publishing.
Salmi, J. (2009).The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington,
D.C: World Bank.
Shuen, A. (2008). Web 2.0: a strategy guide: business thinking and strategies behind
successful Web 2.0 implementations. California: O'Reilly.
Smallwood, C. (2015). Complete guide to using google in libraries: Research user
applications and networking. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Sridhar, M. S. (1992). Problems of collection development in special libraries. New
Delhi: Concept Pub. Co.
Thanuskodi, S. (2013).Challenges of academic library management in developing
countries. Hershey PA: Information Science Reference.
Thomsett-Scott, B. C. (2014). Marketing with sosial media: A LITA guide. California
: American Library Association
Vanwynsberghe, H., Boudry, E., Vanderlinde, R., & Verdegem, P. (2014).Experts as
facilitators for the implementation of social media in the library?A social network
approach.Library Hi Tech, 32(3), 529.
Wildavsky, B. (2010). The great brain race: How global universities are reshaping
the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Willis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational
technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Pub.
We Are Sosial Singapore. (2015). Digital, sosial & mobile in 2015.Maret 30, 2015.
http://www.slideshare.net/wearesosialsg/digital-sosial-mobile-in-2015?related=1.
Weston, Will. (2008). Understanding the integrative role of an academic library for
undergraduate student workers. Disertasi Program Doctor of Philosophy in
Educational Leadership University of New Orleans, Amerika Serikat.
Woodward, J. A. (2009). Creating the customer-driven academic library. Chicago:
American Library Association.
Wordofa, K. H. (2014). Adoption of web 2.0 in academic libraries of top african
universities. The Electronic Library, 32(2), 262-277.
Yamani, A., Soegijoko, W., & Montmerle, T. (2012). Astro talk in social media -
indonesia. International Astronomical Union.Proceedings of the International
Astronomical Union, 10, 654.
Zak, E. (2014). Do you believe in magic? exploring the conceptualization of
augmented reality and its implications for the user in the field of library and
information science. Information Technology & Libraries.33(4): 23-50.
Yang, S. Q., & Dalal, H. A. (2015).Delivering virtual reference services on the web:
an investigation into the current practice by academic libraries.Journal Of
Academic Librarianship. 41(1) : 68-86.
____________. (2014). How is engagement rate defined ?Facebook Help Center.
Maret 29, 2015.https://www.facebook.com/help/178043462360087
____________. (2010). Working together : a strategic framework 2010-2013. Maret
, 2015.http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/strategic_framework.pdf
____________. (n.d). Profil.Juli21, 2015.http://www.lib.ui.ac.id/profil.jsp?hal=1
Humas Universitas Indonesia.(2011). UI Ikut tingkatkan kualitas pers. Juli21, 2015.
http://www.ui.ac.id/download/kliping/UI_Ikut_Tingkatkan_Kualitas_Pers.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jipi.v3i1.1660
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Moh Safii, Zulfikar Zen, Nina Mayesti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
