Integrating Qur’anic Thematic Exegesis and Legal Regulation in Resolving Waqf Disputes in Indonesia

Mukhtar Yunus

Abstract


Throughout 2023, there was a significant increase in waqf disputes in Indonesia, indicating a complex interaction between social customs, positive law, and religious traditions. Using thematic interpretation techniques and legal provisions for resolving waqf litigation in Indonesia, this study seeks to examine the acculturation of Qur’anic values. Employing a qualitative research method with a normative-sociological legal approach, this study analyzes primary data in the form of laws and regulations related to waqf, religious court decisions in 2023, and interviews with actors involved in waqf protection and dispute resolution. The findings show that waqf dispute resolution in Indonesia in 2023 was dominated by issues related to the ownership status of waqf land, the determination of nazir, and the use of waqf benefits that contradicted the objectives of the waqif. The thematic interpretation of Qur’anic verses related to waqf, particularly QS. Ali ‘Imran [3]: 92, QS. al-Baqarah [2]: 261, and QS. al-Baqarah [2]: 271, produces an understanding that waqf is a multidimensional form of worship containing spiritual, social, and economic dimensions. The acculturation of these Qur’anic values with positive legal regulations, particularly Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf and the regulations of the Indonesian Waqf Board, creates a framework for dispute resolution based on the principles of benefit, justice, and the preservation of waqf assets. This study recommends the need to harmonize public religious understanding with positive legal regulations through waqf education based on thematic interpretation and by strengthening the role of the Indonesian Waqf Board in mediating waqf disputes.

Keywords


Acculturation, Thematic Exegesis, Waqf Regulation, Waqf Disputes, Indonesian Waqf Board

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Hasan. “Tafsir Tematik Dalam Konteks Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Historis.” Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 12, no. 1 (2020).

Al-Hajjaj, Muslim bin. Sahih Muslim. Riyadh: Dar al-Salam, 2000.

Al-Kasani. Bada’i’ Al-Sana’i’ Fi Tartib Al-Syara’i’. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah, 1986.

Al-Qurtubi. Tafsir Al-Qurtubi: Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Maktabah al-’Asriyyah, 2006.

Al-Sarakhsi. Al-Mabsut. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1993.

Al-Tabari. Jami’ Al-Bayan ’an Ta’wil Ay Al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr al-’Arabi, 2001.

Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh Al-Islami Wa Adillatuh. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr al-’Arabi, 2009.

Amin al-Khuli. Manahij Tajdid Fi Al-Nahw Wa Al-Balaghah Wa Al-Tafsir Wa Al-Adab. Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1961.

Aminuddin. Hukum Wakaf Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2022.

Badan Wakaf Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan 2023. Jakarta: BWI, 2024.

Frank E.A. Sander. “Varieties of Dispute Processing.” Federal Rules Decisions 70, 1976.

Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 1982.

Hazairin. Hukum Islam Dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1972.

John Braithwaite. Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Khotibul Umam. Perkembangan Sengketa Wakaf Di Indonesia: Tren Dan Tantangan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2023.

———. “Tren Sengketa Wakaf Di Indonesia: Analisis Perkembangan 2022-2023.” Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Masyarakat Kontemporer 14, no. 2 (2023).

Lexy J. Moleong. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

M. Quraish Shihab. “Kontekstualisasi Tafsir Al-Qur’an Dalam Masyarakat Indonesia.” Mimbar Agama Dan Budaya 18, no. 2 (2002).

———. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

———. Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Statistik Perkara Pengadilan Agama 2023. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2024.

Mahkamah Agung RI. Statistik Perkara Pengadilan Agama 2023, n.d.

Melville J. Herskovits. Acculturation: The Study of Culture Contact. New York: J.J. Augustin, 1938.

Muhammad Abu Zahrah. Al-Wakaf Wa Al-Nuqud Al-Islamiyyah. Kairo: Dar al-Fikr al-’Arabi, 2009.

Muhammad al-Ghazali. Nahwa Tafsir Mawdu’i Li Suwar Al-Qur’an Al-Karim. Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Hadithah, 1978.

Muhammad Tahir. Sengketa Wakaf Di Pengadilan Agama: Analisis Yuridis Dan Sosiologis. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Qudamah, Ibn. Al-Mughni. Riyadh: Dar ’Alam al-Kutub, 1997.

Robert Redfield, Ralph Linton, dan Melville J. Herskovits. “Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation.” American Anthropologist 38, no. 1 (1936).

Satjipto Rahardjo. Hukum Dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa, 1980.

———. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Fiqh Al-Zakah: Dirasah Muqaranah Li Ahkamiha Wa Falsafatiha Fi Dlaw’ Al-Qur’an Wa Al-Sunnah. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1997.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jai.v12i2.30697

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Mukhtar Yunus

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/analytica/
 
Publisher:
Program Pascasarjana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara