Juridical Analysis of the Crime of Murder Due to Overmacht in the Perspective of Criminal Law

Van Lodewijk Purba, Chivron Saragih, Jenriswandi Damanik

Abstract


In social life, humans are always faced with various legal norms that are obeyed and obeyed, because the legal norms contain a rule that becomes a reference or life guide for each individual. One of the objectives of legal norms is to establish safety and order in society. These legal norms are sometimes born in the form of orders to be carried out and sometimes born in the form of prohibitions to be avoided or not done. One of the legal norms born in the form of prohibition is the crime of murder which is regulated in criminal law. Law enforcement in Indonesia, guidance and direction, need to be done so that the law is able to meet the needs in accordance with the level of progress of Indonesian society. Law enforcement is the responsibility of all levels of society and especially those who have an interest in the law because everyone is considered to know and at least feel what is called the law.


Keywords


Legal Norms; Criminal Act of Murder; Law Enforcement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anshori, A. (2023). Islamic Criminal Subtance in the RUU-KUHP (Review of legal politics of RUU-KUHP). Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 7(1), 107-120.

Arrosyiid, H., & Febriansyah, F. I. (2023). Criminal acts of murder committed in forced circumstances (Overmacht). International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 2(1), 52-67.

Baker, J., & Nasrudin, R. A. (2024). Is Indonesian police violence excessive? The dynamics of police shootings, 2005–2014. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 54(2), 181-209.

Brink, D. O. (2021). Fair opportunity and responsibility. Oxford University Press.

Butt, S., & Nathaniel, A. (2024). Evidence from criminal law experts in Indonesian criminal trials: Usurping the judicial function?. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 28(2), 129-153.

Crofts, T. (2023). Act now: Raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(1), 118-138.

de Jong, F., Kelk, C., Vervaele, J. A. E., Boone, M. M., Koenraadt, F. A. M. M., Kristen, F. G. H., ... & Sikkema, E. (2015). Overarching Thought: Criminal Law Scholarship in Utrecht. F. de Jong (hoofdred.), Overarching Views of Crime and Deviancy. Rethinking the Legacy of the Utrecht School, Den Haag: Eleven international publishing, 21-88.

Handayani, D., Ilyas, M., & Kuncoro, T. (2023). Analyzing Legal Ramifications for Auction Winners: A Case Study of Bekasi and Makassar Court Decisions on Auction Cancellations. Unnes Law Journal, 9(2), 441-466.

Hintjens, H. (2022). Fear of flooding: Convivial racism in The Netherlands. In The politics of art, death and refuge: The turning tide (pp. 213-243). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Jacobi, T., & Mascia, E. (2023). Alternative facts: The strategy of judicial rhetoric. Emory LJ, 73, 363.

Kautsar, A. R., & Kadir, M. Y. K. A. (2021). TRIAL CRIME OF MURDER IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW (A PUNISHMENT PERSPECTIVE). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan, 5(1), 44-50.

Khan, A., Javed, K., Khan, A. S., & Rizwi, A. (2022). Aggression and individual criminal responsibility in the perspective of Islamic law. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(1), 35-48.

Kramer, E., & Stoicescu, C. (2021). An uphill battle: a case example of government policy and activist dissent on the death penalty for drug-related offences in Indonesia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 92, 103265.

Lernestedt, C., & Matravers, M. (Eds.). (2022). The Criminal Law’s Person. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Legal Research Methods. Prenadamedia Group.

Muskibah, M., Yetniwati, Y., Sasmiar, S., & Holish, A. M. (2023). Force Majeure During COVID-19 Outbreaks: Case of the Cancellation and Termination of Government Construction Contracts. JILS, 8, 129.

Obasogie, O. K. (2021). Excited delirium and police use of force. Virginia Law Review, 107(8), 1545-1620.

Ohoiwutun, Y. A. (2023). Forensic Approach to Optimise Children's Right to Opinion in Indonesian Courts. Lentera Hukum, 10, 45.

Peter Mahmud. (2015). Legal Research Methods. Kencana.

Pihlajamäki, H. (2021). The limits of positivism: Finnish criminal law scholarship and the European context at the turn of the twentieth century. In The Limits of Criminological Positivism (pp. 116-134). Routledge.

Priandy, B., Zulfa, E. A., & Nita, S. (2022). ARRANGEMENTS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INVOLVING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN BRIBERY. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (4 (36)).

Salop, S. C. (2024). The appropriate decision standard for Section 7 cases. U. Balt. L. Rev., 53, 449.

Simester, A. (2021). Fundamentals of criminal law: responsibility, culpability, and wrongdoing. Oxford University Press, USA.

Situmeang, S. M. T., & Aishah, D. N. (2024, July). JUDICAL REVIEW OF PERPETRATORS OF PREMEDITATED MURDER COMMITED ON THE BASIS OF SUPERIOR ORDERS. In Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities (Vol. 7, pp. 1038-1045).

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2003). Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview. Rajawali Pers.

Ward, C. V. (2023). Criminal Justice Reform and the Centrality of Intent. Vill. L. Rev., 68, 51.

Yanuarko, F., & Setiasih, H. (2022). Legal Protection for Workers Who Have Termination of Employment Due to Force Majeure. Acitya Wisesa: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 58-65.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jai.v12i2.23418

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Van Lodewijk Purba, Chivron Saragih, Jenriswandi Damanik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/analytica/ 
 
Publisher:
Program Pascasarjana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara