A Mathematics Learning Outcome Test Characterized by Higher-Order Thinking Skills for Grade V Elementary School Students

I Komang Sesara Ariyana, Sariyasa Sariyasa

Abstract


This research was aimed at developing the results of learning mathematics characteristics of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in the form of multiple choice for grade V elementary school students. This research applied D & D model by Richey & Kleine (2007). HOTS in this study were able to transfer, critical thinking, and solve problems. These aspects are included in Analyzing, Evaluating, and Developing category. Math questions which HOTS were Multi step problems and non-routine questions. The sample of the test experiment was 112 students drawn from four elementary schools in Singaraja Town. The results showed that of 21 items that had been made, there were 20 valid items. The difficulty analysis showed five unfit grains, 14 items were categorized as difficult and one item was categorized as moderate. By the discrimination index, there were two items categorized as high, nine items were categorized as moderate, and four items were categorized as low. The effectiveness of the distractors was fulfilled in all questions. These fifteen items have a degree of reliability of 0.609.


Keywords


Higher-order thinking; Math problems solving; Multiple choice; Test.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. H. Abdullah, N. L. Z. Abidin, & , M. Ali, “Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction”, Asian Social Science, vol. 11, no. 21, pp. 133-142, 2015. Available on link https://epe.bac-lac.gc.ca/100/201/300/asian_social_science/2015/ASS-V11N21-All.pdf?nodisclaimer=1

L. W. Anderson, & D. R. Krathwohl (Eds), “Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Translated by Agung Prihantoro, “A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Taxonomy of Educational Objectives”, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Belajar., 2015.

E. Apino, & H. Retnawati, “Developing Instructional Design to Improve Mathematical Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students”. Journal of Physiscs: Conference Series, vol. 812, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012100

K. Arafah, B. D. Amin, S. S. Sari, & A. Hakim, “The development of higher order-thinking skills (HOTS) instrument assessment in physics study”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1899, No. 1, 2021. IOP Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012140

I. K. S. Ariyana, “Analisis Kebutuhan Tes Hasil Belajar Matematika Sekolah Dasar Berkarakteristik Hots Berbentuk Pilihan Ganda”, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Missio, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 87-98, 2020. Available on link https://scholar.archive.org/work/s5v7t4dcnzeozdd5pgbrgu3f5y/access/wayback/http://unikastpaulus.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/jpkm/article/download/453/353

J. Astutik, “Developing Save Your Food Kit (Sayofu Kit) to Support Inquiry, Improve Student Learning Outcomes at SMP Plus Hidayatul Mubtadiin and Public Awareness on Food Additives”. Journal of Physiscs: Conference Series, vol. 812, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012080

S. M. Brookhart, “How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom”, Virginia USA, ASCD, 2010. Available on link https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/7-%20How%20to%20Assess%20Higher-Order%20Thinking%20Skills%20in%20Your%20Classroom%20-%20Copy%201.pdf

M. I. E. Budiarti, F. Musa’ad, & S. Supriadi, “Analisis Proses Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berorientasi PISA”. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, vol. , no. 4, pp. 533-539, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v4i4.3051

I M. Candiasa, “Pengujian Instrumen Penelitian Disertai Aplikasi ITEMAN dan BIGSTEPS”, Singaraja, Unit Penerbitan UNDIKSHA, 2010.

N. Dantes, “Metode Penelitian”, Yogyakarta, ANDI, 2012.

D. DiBattista, & L. Kurzawa, “Examination of the Quality of Multiple-choice Items on Classroom Tests”. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-23, 2011. Available on link https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ985723

F. I. El-Uri, & N. Malas, “Analysis of Use of A Single Best Answer Format in an Undergraduate Medical Examination”. Qatar Medical Journal, vol. 2013 no. 1, pp. 3-6, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2013.1

L. U. Fatimah, & K. Alfath, “Analisis kesukaran soal, daya pembeda dan fungsi distraktor”. AL-MANAR: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 37-64, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36668/jal.v8i2.115

F. M. Firdaus, “Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dalam Pembelajaran Pecahan di Kelas V SDN Nangela Kabupaten Bandung)”, PEDAGOGIK, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80-88, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33558/pedagogik.v3i1.1262

M. Firja MKS, “Metode Pembelajaran Matematika yang Efektif dalam Meningkatkan High Order Thinking Siswa”, Journal on Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 22406-22415, E-ISSN: 2654-5497, P-ISSN: 2655-1365, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.6407

K. Fitriani, & Maulana. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SD Kelas V Melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik”, Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 40-52, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v3i1.2355

S. Giarti, “Peningkatan Keterampilan Proses Pemecahan Masalah Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Menggunakan Model Pbl Terintegrasi Penilaian Autentik Pada Siswa Kelas VI SDN 2 Bengle, Wonosegoro”, Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, vol. 4, no. 3, 13-27, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2014.v4.i3.p13-27

G. E., Gilbert, & S. Prion, “Making Sense of Methods and Measurments: Lawshe’s Content Validity Index”. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 530-531, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002

N. E. Gronlund, “Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching”, New York, Macmillan Publishing, 1981.

A. Gymnastiar, N. N. A’fiani, N. B. Ramadhan, & A. N. Aeni, “Pengembangan Media Articulate Storyline Untuk Pembentukan Akhlak Terpuji Siswa Kelas VI SD”, Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 16(4), 1241-1248, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35931/aq.v16i4.1062

Lutfianto, et al., “Unfinished Student Answer in PISA Mathematics Contextual Problem”. IndoMS-JME, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 188-193, 2013. Available on link https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078951

A.R. Menon, & P. N. Kannambra, “Item Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions”. National Journal of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7-10, 2017. Available on link https://njlm.net/articles/PDF/2215/25690_CE[VSU]_F(GH)_PF1(VsuGH)_PFA(GH)_PF2(VsuGH).pdf

NCTM (National Council Teacher of Mathematics), “Principles and Standard for School Mathematics”, Restin VA, NCTM, 2000.

N. R. Nengsih, E. Yusmaita, & F. Gazali, “Evaluasi validitas konten dan konstruk bahan ajar asam basa berbasis REACT”, EduKimia, 1(1), 1-10, 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335963036_Evaluasi_Validitas_Konten_dan_Konstruk_Bahan_Ajar_Asam_Basa_Berbasis_REACT

P. P. Noor, & A. P. Abadi, “Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam perkembangan pembelajaran matematika SMA”. Jurnal Educatio Fkip Unma, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 466-473, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.1986

J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1978.

S.C. Ohiri, & R. O. Okoye, “Application of classical test theory as linear modeling to test item development and analysis”, International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(1), 2152-2159, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379511621_APPLICATION_OF_CLASSICAL_TEST_THEORY_AS_LINEAR_MODELING_TO_TEST_ITEM_DEVELOPMENT_AND_ANALYSIS

Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “Framework for 21st Century Learning”, 2006. Available on link https://www.marietta.edu/sites/default/files/documents/21st_century_skills_standards_book_2.pdf.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills, “21st Century Skills, Education & Competitiveness: A Resource and Policy Guide”, 2008. Available on link https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519337.pdf.

Permendikbud RI Nomor 67 Tahun 2013 tentang Kurikulum SD.

E. Purwaaktari, “Pengaruh Model Collaborative Learning terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dan Sikap Sosial Siswa Kelas V SD Jarakan Sewon Bantul”. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 95-111, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v8i1.4932

Y. Y. Putra, et al., “Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Konten Bilangan Untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa”. Jurnal Elemen, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14-26, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.175

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D., “Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues”, New Jersey, Routledge, 2007.

J. Rubin, & M. Rajakaruna, “Teaching and Assessing Higher Order Thinking in the Mathematics Classroom with Clickers”. iSER, Mathematics Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37-51, ISSN: 1306-3030, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/290

Ruhyana, “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika”. Jurnal Computech & Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 106-118, 2016. Available on link https://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=568508&val=7183&title=Analisis%20Kesulitan%20Siswa%20Dalam%20Pemecahan%20Masalah%20Matematika

C. Santi, A. Helmon, & E. Sennen, “Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar: Masalah Dan Upaya Yang Dapat Dilakukan”. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 31-40, 2021. Available on link https://www.neliti.com/publications/408790/pembelajaran-pemecahan-masalah-matematika-di-sekolah-dasar-masalah-dan-upaya-yan

C. L. Scott, “The Futures of Learning 2: What Kind of Learning for the 21st Century?”, UNESCO Education Research and Foresight, ERF Working Papers Series, no. 14, 2015. Available on link https://repositorio.minedu.gob.pe/handle/20.500.12799/3709

D. Scully, “Constructing Multiple-Choice Items to Measure Higher-Order Thinking”, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/swgt-rj52

A. N. Shete, & A. Kausar, “Item analysis: An evaluation of multiple choice questions in Physiology examination”. Journal of Contemporary Medical Education, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 106-109, 2015. Available on link https://www.academia.edu/download/82874839/item-analysis-an-evaluation-of-multiple-choice-questions-in-physiology-examination.pdf

K. S. Shultz, et al., “Measurement Theory in Action Case Studies and Exercises”, New York, Routledge, 2014.

T. Sonnabend, “Mathematics for Teachers: An Interactive Approach for Grades K–8 Fourth Edition”, USA, Brooks/Cole, 2010.

I G. P. Suharta, “Kemampuan Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Real”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 137-147, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v49i3.9018

R. Sumarni, “Kemampuan Guru Menyusun Soal HOTS dalam Bentuk Pilihan Ganda di SDN 02 Legokgunung”. Action Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 262-265, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51651/arj.v1i3.77

N. M. Tajudin, Mathematical Knowledge and Higher Order Thinking Skills For Teaching Algebraic Problem Solving, SOCIOINT15, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, pp. 8-10, 2015, Available on link http://www.ocerint.org/socioint15_epublication/papers/54.pdf

Usmaedi, “Menggagas Pembelajaran HOTS pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar”, JPSD, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 82-95, ISSN 2540-9093, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v3i1.1040

J. A.Van de Walle, et al., “Elementary and middle school mathematics teaching developmentally (8th)”, United States of America, Pearson Education, 2013.

S. Wardhani, et al., “Modul Matematika SD Program BERMUTU: Pembelajaran Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di SD”, Yogyakarta, PPPPTK Matematika, 2010.

I W. Widana, “Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment (HOTS)”. JISAE, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 32-44, 2017. Available on link https://www.academia.edu/download/73441255/c61336810e46336d43c29c4195c8d86dfd66.pdf

A. Wijaya, “The Relationships between Indonesian Fourth Graders’ Difficulties in Fractions and the Opportunity to Learn Fractions: A Snapshot of TIMSS Results”. International Journal of Instruction, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 221-236, 2017. Available on link https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1163264

A. Wijaya, et al., “Opportunity-to-Learn Context-Based Tasks Provided by Mathematics Textbooks”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 41-65, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1

A. A. Zahra, & A. K. At-Taqiyyah, “Mengukur kemampuan kognitif tingkat tinggi dengan pertanyaan pilihan ganda”. Jurnal Pelita Nusantara, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 462-470, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59996/jurnalpelitanusantara.v1i4.336




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/zero.v8i2.21807

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher :
Department of Mathematics
Faculty of Science and Technology
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
📱 WhatsApp:085270009767 (Admin Official)
SINTA 2 Google Scholar CrossRef Garuda DOAJ