THE VLOG REGISTER IN BAHASA INDONESIA: AN ETHNOLINGUISTICS STUDY

Danang Satria Nugraha

Abstract


This study aims to describe the vlog register in Bahasa Indonesia (BI) in the light of Ethnolinguistics. The vlog (video blogging) being viral almost when the young speakers of Bahasa Indonesia doing a new branch of communication to express their identity. In addition to the unstandard grammar, the speaking youth of BI produced new lexicons that presented in their Vlog, such as kabz, jones, tamvan, pemverani, gaes, haters, baper, kepo, YXGQ, wagelasih, apeng, dan cmiiw. Describing the vlog register in Bahasa Indonesia, this research (a) used simak method (or observation method) on the data collection based on Blommaert’s model (2013) from the source of spoken and of Bahasa Indonesia and (b) used padan method on the data analysis that accompanied by Biber and Conrad’s framework (2009). This study, in particular, shows that vlog register in Bahasa Indonesia at least has three characteristics, namely (a) field, (b) linguistic features, and (c) functions. Generally, based on the ethnolinguistics identity theory (ELIT), those three characteristics interpreted as a marker of process on identity construction by the speaking youth facing the standard form of Bahasa Indonesia.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andalas, M. (2004). Dari Generasi Net Menuju Generasi Pelopor. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Biber, D. & Finegan. (1994). Sociolinguistcis Perpectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D. (1995). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity, and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Cayari, C. (2011). “The YouTube Effect: How YouTube Has Provided New Ways to Consume, Create, and Share Music,” Int. J. Educ. Arts, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1–27.

Dąbrowska, M. (2013). Variation in Language: Faces of Facebook English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang,

Duranti, A. (2004). A Companion to Linguistics Anthropology. USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Gabriele, E. (2016). “Situating Genre on YouTube: We Rant, We Laugh, We Conquer?.” University of Rhode Island.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

Munsyi, A.D. (2005). Bahasa Menunjukkan Bangsa. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Gramedia Populer.

Rahardi, R.K. (2014). “Bahasa ‘Indoglish’ dan ‘Jawanesia’ dan Dampaknya bagi Pemartabatan Bahasa Indonesia,” Kaji. Linguist. Dan Sastra, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–21.

Riley, P. (2007) Language, Culture, and Identity: an Ethnolinguistics Perspective. London: Continuum.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Tomasello, M. (2010). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Werner, E. (2012). Rants, Reactions, and Other Rhetorics: Genres of the YouTube Vlog. United States: UMI.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
IJLRES- International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies published by English Language Center, Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training, UIN of North Sumatra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on work at: http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/ijlres

2580-6777 (Print ISSN), 2580-6785 (Online ISSN)