.png)
Regulation on the Prohibition of Consanguineous and Affinity Family Relationships in the Structure of Cooperative Establishment
Abstract
Cooperatives as business entities based on the principle of family hold a strategic role in the national economy as mandated by Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This research is motivated by the emergence of norms prohibiting blood and marriage relationships up to the first degree between administrators, supervisors, and managers in Article 50 in conjunction with Article 55 of the Regulation of the Minister of Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises Number 8 of 2023 concerning Savings and Loan Businesses by Cooperatives, a norm that was previously unknown in Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives or its implementing regulations. The problem arises because the concept of blood and marriage to the first degree used is not explicitly aligned with the standard mechanism for calculating the degree of kinship in Articles 290-296 of the Civil Code, thus creating potential legal uncertainty for cooperative organs, cooperative services, and notaries. This study aims to analyze the legal ratio for the formation of the norm and formulate the concept and scope of the degrees of kinship that should apply using normative legal methods with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the prohibition is formally valid, but materially does not have an explicit legal ratio legis and is more of a non-legal policy or political reason to prevent conflicts of interest. This study also concludes that the concepts of blood and marriage need to be harmonized with the Civil Code and their scope expanded to the second degree to meet the requirements of legal certainty.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adiyanti, A., Putri, N. A., Adni, M. N., Hilwa, A., Assyariefa, A. H., & Nugraha, D. M. (2024). Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Masyarakat Terkait Bahaya Perkembangan Tindak Nepotisme Di Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(12), 147–152.
Ahmad Zabadi. (2023). Pengurus Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Dilarang Miliki Hubungan Keluarga. Pasardana.Id. https://pasardana.id/news/2023/7/6/pengurus-koperasi-simpan-pinjam-dilarang-miliki-hubungan-keluarga
Antoni, V., & Razaga, A. F. (2024). PERMASALAHAN HUKUM PADA KEGIATAN KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DI INDONESIA. Vej, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v10i1.7801
Atsar, A. (2024). Perkembangan Hukum Koperasi di Indonesia. In CV Budi Utama, Yogyakarta.
Azhary, V. H. (2019). NEPOTISME DAN GRATIFIKASI SEBAGAI UNSUR BUDAYA PADA KORUPSI POLITIK DAN BIROKRASI DI INDONESIA. Simposium Nasional Ilmiah Dengan Tema: (Peningkatan Kualitas Publikasi Ilmiah Melalui Hasil Riset Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 7(November), 754–762. https://doi.org/10.30998/simponi.v0i0.437
Badri, S., Handayaniri, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti Rugi Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dan Wanprestasi Dalam Sistem Hukum Perdata. Jurnal USMLaw Review, 7(2), 974–985.
Fuller, L. L. (1964). The Morality of Law, Revised Edition.
Hendrojogi. (2004). Koperasi: Asas-asas, Teori dan Praktik (p. 35). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hutapea, B. B. (2026). Pembatasan Kewenangan Pengurus dan Mekanisme Pengawasan dalam Pengelolaan Hasil Usaha Koperasi Penerima Bantuan Pemerintah. MAJELIS, 3(1).
Jimly Asshiddiqie and Muchamad Ali safaat. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum (p. 110). Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kenpaniteraan.
Keputusan Menteri Negara Koperasi Dan Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor 98/Kep/M.KUKM/IX/2004 tentang Notaris Sebagai Pembuat Akta Koperasi. (2004).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (1848).
Manosoh, H. (2016). Good Corporate Governance Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Laporan Keuangan.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Grup, Jakarta.
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Penemuan Hukum : Sebuah Pengantar. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Peraturan Menteri Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Nomor 8 Tahun 2023 tentang Usaha Simpan Pinjam Oleh Koperasi. (2023).
Perubahan Kode Etik Notaris. (2015).
R. Subekti dan R. Tjitrosudibio. (1992). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Burgerlijk Wetboek dengan Tambahan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Cetakan ke-25.
Saza, L. N. Y., Sakti, D. P. B., & Furkan, L. M. (2021). TATA KELOLA KOPERASI DI KABUPATEN LOMBOK TIMUR (Studi Kasus pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam) COOPERATIVE GOVERNANCE IN EAST LOMBOK DISTRICT (Case Study on Savings and Loans Cooperative). Jurnal EMBA, 9(2), 23–33.
Sitorus, P. (2021). BUY SPEAR FROM SIDE OR BEAR IT: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF PENGATURAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA DAN BELANDA. Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 1(2).
Subagyo, A. (2017). Pengawasan Koperasi di Indonesia.
Sumaryono, E. (1995). Etika Profesi Hukum : Norma-Norma Bagi Penegak Hukum. Kanisius.
Syaputra, M. Y. A. (2016). KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENEGASAN HIEARAKI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF STUFEN THEORIE. Jurnal Mercatoria, 9(2), 99.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Inonesia. (1945).
UU No. 16 Tahun 2025 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas UU No 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara. (2025).
UU No. 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian,. (1992).
UU No 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. (2014).
Waluyo, B., Prasetyo, H., & Subakdi. (2019). Independensi Direktur Independen Pada Perusahaan Publik. Esensi Hukum, 1(1), 24–39.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v10i1.30144
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
