.png)
Legal Considerations of the Notary Supervisory Board Regarding the Concept of Carefulness and Legal Consequences For Deeds Made Based on False Information
Abstract
This research examines the legal responsibility of notaries for authentic deeds made based on false statements from the perspective of the Regional Supervisory Council of Southeast Sulawesi. The main issues explored are how the MPW interprets the phrase "careful and thorough" in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (a) of the Notary Act and how such interpretation affects the validity of deeds and the notary's legal liability. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches that link positive legal norms with MPW Decision No. 6/PTS/MPWN_Prov.Sultra/I/2025 jo 04/PTS/MPWN_Prov.Sultra/VI/2025. Findings indicate that the MPW considers the notary's failure to verify documents and parties' identities as culpa lata (gross negligence), rendering the deed invalid as an authentic instrument. The results demonstrate that the prudential principle in notarial practice functions not merely as an administrative norm but as an ethical-professional standard that ensures the integrity of authentic deeds. The study highlights the urgency of establishing a Code of Prudence as a standardized ethical assessment tool to strengthen supervision, prevent inter-council disparities, and balance public protection with professional security.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhilia, L. T. F., & Tarring, A. D. (2022). Prosedur Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 9(4), 320-330. https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/216
Adjie, H. (2023). Legal Study Regarding the Responsibilities of Notaries in Providing Social Services in Accordance with the Implementation of their Position. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), 1-16. https://ojs.journalsdg.org/jlss/article/view/1435
Aisyah, S. (2021). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Akta Notaris Yang Tidak Sesuai Dengan Fakta Hukum. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v10i2.1439
Anhar, M. Z., Yahanan, A., & Ahmaturrahman, A. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Pembuatan Akta Autentik Yang Tidak Dibacakan Di Hadapan Penghadap [Undergraduate, Sriwijaya University]. https://repository.unsri.ac.id/35297/
Arben, A., & Utama, A. S. (2024). Kedudukan Akta Notaris Sebagai Akta Autentik Dalam Hukum Perdata Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. ANDREW Law Journal, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.61876/alj.v3i1.26
Atmadja, I. D. G., & Budiartha, I. N. P. (2018). Teori-Teori Hukum. Setara Press. https://repository.warmadewa.ac.id/id/eprint/441/
Baumgärtner, S., Petersen, T., & Schiller, J. (2018). The Concept of Responsibility: Norms, Actions and Their Consequences (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 3157667). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157667
Chandra, I. G. A. W., & Purwanto, I. W. N. (2024). The Role And Responsibilities of A Notary In Public Services Based on Professional Ethic Morals and Law. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(6), 1937-1945. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i6.601
Fikri Ariesta Rahman. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam mengenal para penghadap [Master Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/11491
Ghani, A. R., Firdaus, M., & Ansari, M. A. (2025). Peran Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Keabsahan Hukum Di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(2), 1574-1582. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i2.1147
Gustav Radbruch's Concept of Law (with Robert Alexy). (2021). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796831.003.0008
Haman, D. (2021). Distinction between Dolus and Culpa with reference to Arson in Zakon Sudnyj LJudem, the Vinodol Law and the Statute of Senj. De Jure, 21(1), 142-146. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=957287
Indonesia, Pemerintah Pusat. (2014a). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38565/uu-no-2-tahun-2014
Indonesia, Pemerintah Pusat. (2014b). Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38565/uu-no-2-tahun-2014
Kelsen, H. (2017). General Theory of Law and State. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790960
Khanza, M. (2025). Kewenangan Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Berkaitan Dengan Bukti-Bukti Yang Diserahkan Para Pihak Untuk Pelaksanaan Surat Perjanjian Bersama (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 693/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mdn). Indonesian Notary, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.21143/notary.vol7.no3.490
Lesmana, R. M., & Aryatama, D. S. (2022). The Legal Consequences of the Forgive Deed Bringed by the Prisoner to the Notary. Khazanah Hukum, 4(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i2.14891
Lestari, N. A. (2022). Peningkatan Fungsi Pengawasan oleh Majelis Pengawasan Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Pelanggaran Kewenangan Dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris. Officium Notarium, 2(2), 324-333. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss2.art14
Madyastuti, R. (2020). Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Terjadinya Pelanggaran Kewenangan Dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris [Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/32339
Muhammad, Y. F., & Santoso, B. (2023). Penerapan Sanksi Serta Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik Notaris Oleh Dewan Kehormatan. Notarius, 16(2), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.40913
Mutmainah, I., & Sabir, M. (2019). Wasiat Wajibah Bagi Ahli Waris Beda Agama (Analisis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 368K/AG/1995). DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 17(2), 188-210. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v17i2.818
Napouling, D. (2022). Pemberhentian Dengan Tidak Hormat Bagi Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana (Studi Putusan Majelis Pengawas Pusat Nomor: 18/B/MPPN/XII/2017). Indonesian Notary, 4(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/notary/vol4/iss2/18
Paramaningrat Manuaba, I. B., Parsa, I. W., & Ketut Ariawan, I. G. (2018). Prinsip Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Membuat Akta Autentik [Journal: eArticle, Udayana University]. In Acta Comitas (Vol. 03, p. 241261). https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i01.p05
Pratama, B., Warsito, H., & Adriansyah, H. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Membuat Akta Oleh Notaris. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 11(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1640
Putri, S. A., & Simanjuntak, V. L. O. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Peran Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris Terkait Pengalihan Hak Merek. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(8), 2625-2636. https://doi.org/10.59141/cerdika.v5i8.2788
Safira, A. (2025). Kepatuhan Terhadap Kode Etik Sebagai Parameter Notaris untuk Mencegah Terjadinya Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 5(3), 1738-1747. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.3625
Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2022). Penelitian Hukum: Legal Research. Sinar Grafika.
Suyanto, S. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Vicky, V., Samosir, T., & Harlina, I. (2024). Akibat Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Tidak Saksama Dalam Pembuatan Akta Kuasa Menjual (Studi Kasus Putusan No 20pk/Pid/2020). Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 10(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v10i2.2737dakjjdh
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.26548
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
