Protection of Third Party Preferential Rights in the Confiscation of Corruption Crime Assets in Indonesia

Rini Purwandari, Shinta Hadiyantina, Bambang Sugiri

Abstract


Corruption in Indonesia is not only understood as a criminal act that harms state finances, but also as a violation of human rights, especially when assets resulting from corruption are confiscated but are found to be controlled by third parties acting in good faith. This study aims to analyze the meaning of legal regulations related to the protection of third-party preferential rights and to formulate an ideal regulatory concept for the future. Using a prescriptive-analytical normative juridical method, this study examines legislative approaches, case studies, and court decisions. The results show that the existing legal framework, including the PTPK Law and Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2022, does not provide comprehensive guarantees for the rights of third parties. The case studies of Bank Jatim and PT Sritex reveal a legal vacuum in practice, where legitimate secured creditors remain vulnerable when assets are confiscated. This study concludes that without clear and synchronized regulations, asset seizure has the potential to create new injustices, undermine public trust, and disrupt legal certainty in economic activities. Therefore, the reconstruction of more adaptive and transparent regulations is an urgent need to balance the interests of the state in asset recovery and the protection of bona fide third parties.

Keywords


Asset Seizure; Third Parties; Preferential Rights; Corruption; Legal Certainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung Satryo Wibowo, Lufsiana, & Dharmawan Setiawan negara. (2025). Hukum Pidana Perpajakan dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Titik Singgung, Perbedaan dan Implikasi Hukum. Indonesia Emas Group. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=_MVUEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA143&dq=Dalam+konteks+perampasan+aset,+ketiadaan+regulasi+yang+tegas+seringkali+menimbulkan+ketidakpastian,+baik+bagi+aparat+penegak+hukum+maupun+bagi+pihak+ketiga&ots=Bqh8xFLSst&sig=bGbIEraBb12_C-AczMd-rZufieg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Ali Murtadho, N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditor Preferen dalam Pemberesan Proses Kepailitan. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 1(4), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.2499

Ali, Z. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=y_QrEAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Andriawan, H. (2024). Pelaksanaan Penetapan Pengadilan Yang Mengabulkan Permohonan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Perampasan Barang Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi [Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/50407

Bahder Johan Nasution. (2018). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Cetakan ke 10). Mandar Maju. https://mandarmaju.com/main/detail/321/Metode-Penelitian-Ilmu-Hukum

Carakata, S. P. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Pada Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/63262/Perlindungan-Hukum-Bagi-Kreditur-Terhadap-Objek-Jaminan-Fidusia-Yang-Tidak-Didaftarkan-Pada-Kantor-Pendaftaran-Fidusia-Studi-di-Pengadilan-Negeri-Yogyakarta

Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31436

Evander. (2024). Keberatan Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik Terhadap Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurist-Diction, 7(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i1.54674

Fadli, M., & Hadi, S. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Perspektif Teoritik. Nuswantara Media Utama.

Herman, H., & Rusman, R. (2025). Asset Forfeiture: A Blueprint for Justice, Legal Reform and Corruption Eradication. Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.51825/yta.v5i1.30866

Hyronimus Rhiti. (2015). Mengenal Filsafat Hukum (Cetakan ke 5). PT Kanisius. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Mengenal_Filsafat_Hukum.html?id=Qxm6EAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Immanuel Citra Senjaya & Edhy Susilo. (2025, July 10). Kurator Sritex sampaikan keberatan atas penyitaan aset oleh Kejagung. Antara Jateng. https://jateng.antaranews.com/berita/589773/kurator-sritex-sampaikan-keberatan-atas-penyitaan-aset-oleh-kejagung

Ismayani, Mashdurohatun, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2023). Reconstruction of Fiduciary Collateral Execution Regulations Due to False Debtors Based on Justice Value. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 129(0), 16. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/129-03

Lubis, F., Ayuni, N. P., Indah, D. V., Purba, N. Z., Ibadurrahman, T., & Maliha, Z. (2025). Kajian Asas-Asas Equality Before The Law Dalam Praktik Peradilan Perdata. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 5390–5406. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19521

Mega, C. O., & Badriyah, S. M. (2024). Akibat Hukum Pengalihan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Sebelum Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan. Notarius, 17(2), 1232–1249. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i2.49922

Muammar, M., & Meldandy, M. (2022). Application Of Supplementary Penalty As A Substitute For Money In Cases Of Corruption Criminal Proceedings. Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 4(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v4i1.564

Nanda Perdana Putra. (2025, May 24). Kejati Jakarta Sita Tanah Senilai Rp50 Miliar Terkait Kasus Kredit Fiktif Bank Jatim. liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/6032283/kejati-jakarta-sita-tanah-senilai-rp50-miliar-terkait-kasus-kredit-fiktif-bank-jatim

Nurfitriana M., R. (2021). Corporate Asset Forfeiture Toward Criminal Offenses Related to Money Laundering [Masters, Universitas Hasanuddin]. https://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/17792/

Putri, F. A. (2023). Perampasan Aset Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/225141?

Ramon, E. (2021). Penerapan Penghitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi [Masters, Universitas Islam Riau]. https://repository.uir.ac.id/15168/

Setiawan, R. A., & Ismono, J. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Kreditur Preferen Dalam Upaya Parate Executie Perjanjian Fidusia Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Law and Humanity, 1(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.37504/lh.v1i3.581

Taufano, M. A. I. G., & Silalahi, W. (2024). Konsekuensi Hak Tanggungan Perjanjian Kredit Antara Kreditor dan Debitor. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 11201–11208. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2055

Triawati Prihatsari. (2025). 72 Mobil Aset Sritex Disita, Eks Pekerja Resah. https://www.metrotvnews.com. https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/bD2CM30j-72-mobil-aset-sritex-disita-eks-pekerja-resah

Zilmi Haridhi. (2023). RUU Perampasan Aset: Revolusi Penegakan Hukum Melalui Pemulihan Aset yang Disalahgunakan | ICW. https://antikorupsi.org/id/ruu-perampasan-aset-revolusi-penegakan-hukum-melalui-pemulihan-aset-yang-disalahgunakan?




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.26000

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
Creative Commons License
International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies (IJLRES) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License . You are free to share and adapt the material under the terms of this license, provided appropriate credit is given, it is not used for commercial purposes, and any derivatives are shared under the same license.