Hisab Method in Order to Resolve Differences in Arafah Fasting Between Indonesia With Saudi Arabia: A Study of Professor Syamsul Anwar's Thoughts

Ahmad Yunan Siregar

Abstract


According to Professor Syamsul Anwar, this rukyat method has various obstacles, including among the natural obstacles is the limited range of rukyat, especially at the beginning of the month, which is visible from the surface of the earth. Therefore, it will differ between countries that have seen it and areas that have not. In other words, rukyat is a universal tool but applies temporally and locally. Therefore, according to him, the method that can unify the beginning of the lunar month is the hisab method because this method is more accurate reliable for now. Which the problems in this research are: (1) how does Professor Syamsul Anwar view Rukyatul Hilal in relation to the beginning of the lunar month, (2) how does Professor Syamsul Anwar think about hisab and (3) what efforts can be made to unify religious moments such as Eid al-Fitr, Eid al-Adha including the differences in the implementation of the Arafah fast between Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. The results of the research show that the rukyat method according to Professor Syamsul Anwar causes many obstacles, because the range of rukyat is limited in its appearance on the surface of the earth, it is possible that the hilal is visible in Saudi Arabia, but not in Indonesia. The hilal may be visible in America but not in Saudi Arabia. Because of the differences in rukyat in various places, the beginning of the month also falls differently, this is different from hisab, because hisab does not experience obstacles with natural factors, because it calculates the actual movement of the moon, so the hisab method can determine the beginning of the month simultaneously throughout the world.


Keywords


Rukyah, Hisab, Al-Maqashid Ash-Shari'ah, Arafah Fasting, Unified Islamic Calendar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Bukhari. (2004). Shahih Bukhari. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.

Anwar, Syamsul. (2015). “Penyatuan Kalender Hijriyah Internasional Momen yang Tepat”. Suara Muhammadiyah, No. 19 Tahun Ke-100, 1–15 Oktober 2015.

Asqalani, Ibnu Hajar. (1959). Fath al-Bari, Juz V. Mesir: Syirkah Mushtafa al-Babi al-Halabi.

Azhari, Susiknan, dan Ahmad Izzuddin. (2007). Ilmu Falak: Perjumpaan Khazanah Islam dan Sains Modern. Yogyakarta: Suara Muhammadiyah.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. (t.t.). Al-Fiqh al-Islami wa Adillatuhu, Juz III. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (1989). Al-Qur'an al-Karim dan Terjemahannya. Semarang: Toha Putra.

Djamaluddin, Thomas. (2005). Menggagas Fiqih Astronomi: Telaah Hisab dan Rukyat serta Pencarian Solusi Perbedaan Hari Raya. Bandung: Kaki Langit.

Ja’far. (2016). Tradisi Intelektual Al Washliyah: Biografi Ulama Kharismatik dan Tradisi Keulamaan. Medan: Perdana Publishing.

Wensinck, A. J. (1943). Al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfaz al-Hadis an-Nabawi. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Yuslem, Nawir. (2015). Penetapan Idul Adha 1436 H dalam Perspektif Majelis Tarjih Muhammadiyah. Makalah pada Acara Dialog Pembahasan Perbedaan Penetapan Penanggalan Hijriyah dalam Menyikapi Terjadinya Perbedaan Idul Adha 1436 H, Medan, 19 September 2015. Medan: Pascasarjana UMSU.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7006/attafahum.v1i1.665

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Islamic Law

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Based on a work at http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/attafahum/
 
Publisher:
Postgraduate Program
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara