From Traditional Records to Standardized Reporting: The Impact of PSAK 45 and PSAK 109 on Mosque Financial Transparency
Abstract
This study examines the reconstruction of mosque financial reporting systems in Indonesia through the application of PSAK 45 and PSAK 109 in response to persistent governance challenges. Despite managing substantial public funds, many mosques continue to rely on manual, non-standardized bookkeeping practices that limit transparency, auditability, and accountability. National evidence indicates that more than 70% of mosques have not implemented formal accounting standards, resulting in inconsistent reporting and weak oversight. Using a qualitative literature review, this study synthesizes empirical findings, regulatory frameworks, and theoretical perspectives to evaluate the relevance and applicability of PSAK 45 for nonprofit financial reporting and PSAK 109 for managing zakat, infak, and sadaqah funds. The review reveals that both standards provide structured mechanisms for fund classification, disclosure, and documentation, allowing mosques to transition from informal cash-based reports to comprehensive, auditable statements. However, implementation remains constrained by limited financial literacy, lack of regulatory enforcement, and cultural perceptions of informal mosque governance. The study proposes an integrated framework emphasizing capacity building, standardized reporting templates, and strengthened internal controls. The findings highlight that adopting PSAK 45 and PSAK 109 offers significant opportunities to enhance institutional credibility, donor trust, and long-term financial sustainability. This research underscores the urgent need for standardized accounting practices to modernize mosque financial governance and strengthen public accountability
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amoako, G. K., & Lyon, A. (2014). Accounting and accountability practices of NGOs: A case of Ghana. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(3), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2012-0118
Ahmad, R., & Maulida, N. (2020). Implementation of PSAK 109 in Enhancing Zakat and Philanthropy Accountability. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 12(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v12i2.2020
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.142
Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2017). The donation recognition process: Accounting and accountability implications. The British Accounting Review, 49(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.09.001
Ebrahim, A. (2016). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Lessons from accountability research. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0020
Gandía, J. L. (2011). Internet disclosure by nonprofit organizations: Empirical evidence of nongovernmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009343782
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Survey Nasional Pengelolaan Keuangan Masjid 2022.
Modell, S. (2020). Triangulation in case study research in accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 50(5), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1679201
Mohd Noor, A. H., Wahab, N. A., & Haji-Othman, Y. (2020). Accountability practices of zakat institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(4), 1047–1063. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2017-0138
Saxton, G. D., Neely, D. G., & Guo, C. (2019). Web disclosure and transparency of nonprofit organizations: A systematic review and future research agenda. Voluntas, 30(4), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00159-z
Sari, M., & Wulandari, R. (2021). The Role of PSAK 45 in Improving Transparency of Nonprofit Organizations. Jurnal Manajemen dan Teknologi, 12(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v12i1.2021
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tempo. (2023). Laporan Transparansi Keuangan Masjid di Indonesia. Tempo.co.
Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.004
Verbruggen, S., Christiaens, J., & Milis, K. (2015). Accountability and transparency in nonprofits: The logic of publicness. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12378
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.004
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jai.v14i2.26852
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Hazmi Erde, Nurlaila Nurlaila

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




